2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical organization in visual working memory: From global ensemble to individual object structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we show that, when presented with more objects than the maximum capacity, observers can still store high-quality representations of a subset of the objects, without retaining any information about the others. However, within the limited number of items that can be retained, a variable resource is available to represent the to-be-memorized objects (Nie, Müller, & Conci, 2017;Zhang & Luck, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we show that, when presented with more objects than the maximum capacity, observers can still store high-quality representations of a subset of the objects, without retaining any information about the others. However, within the limited number of items that can be retained, a variable resource is available to represent the to-be-memorized objects (Nie, Müller, & Conci, 2017;Zhang & Luck, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a) might already motivate a maximization of individual‐item representations, but at least one ensemble representation may have to be held mandatorily. Under different task conditions, participants might decide to encode the displays at higher levels of abstraction, thus moving from representations of single features (individual items) to representations containing multiple features (i.e., they could decide to strategically use more ensemble‐like representations; e.g., Greene & Oliva, ; Nie, Müller, & Conci, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies have assumed that features or objects are represented independently of each other in WM, recent evidence suggests that these representations are organized in a hierarchically structured fashion (Nie et al, 2017). Some researchers propose that the cognitive processes (i.e., WM) involved in combining objects in a hierarchical organization and combining words into sentences are homologous and occur in the same neural structure (Fadiga et al, 2009;Greenfield, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%