2005
DOI: 10.1007/11534310_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Multicast Tree Algorithms for Application Layer Mesh Networks

Abstract: Abstract. This paper proposes a set of novel multicast algorithms for m-D mesh overlay networks that can achieve shorter multicast delay and less resource consumptions. In contrast to previous approaches, our algorithms partition the group members into clusters in the lower layer, seeking an optimal core (root) to guarantee the minimum routing delay for each cluster and building a shared tree within each cluster to minimize the number of links used. In the upper layer, a shared tree is then constructed using o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system saturation points for DPM, DCXY, RCXYP, OCXYP, RCWP and OMTDG are about 20.5, 21.4, 23.5, 35, 36.0 and 38 packets/ms respectively. The new algorithms proposed in this paper achieve the maximum throughput [10]. It reveals that under the same condition, OMTDG obtains the best balance over the performance parameters, i.e., the less resource a system consumes, the higher the throughput and the shorter the end-to end delay under the weight traffic load.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The system saturation points for DPM, DCXY, RCXYP, OCXYP, RCWP and OMTDG are about 20.5, 21.4, 23.5, 35, 36.0 and 38 packets/ms respectively. The new algorithms proposed in this paper achieve the maximum throughput [10]. It reveals that under the same condition, OMTDG obtains the best balance over the performance parameters, i.e., the less resource a system consumes, the higher the throughput and the shorter the end-to end delay under the weight traffic load.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a downside of this topology, there is a large number of connections that must be maintained, which grows exponentially with the number of OHs. However, the simplicity of the routing algorithms between OHs makes this topology a great candidate for using it as a leaf component in hierarchical topologies [16], [17]. EHs are the producers and consumers of data transferred by the overlay.…”
Section: Overlay Topology and Distribution Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cluster formation guarantees that each cluster contains the closest group members in terms of static delay distance [ 19 ]. According to the results in [ 20 ], the scheme that assigns closed members into the same cluster will improve the scalability and efficiency of the multicast data transfers of the sensor grid.…”
Section: Algorithms For Game and Balance Multicast Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And we chose three multicast routing approaches for 2- D Sensor grid used for the performance testing and comparison: SPACE which just considers space factor; DATA which just considers data factor; and GBMASG which synthetically considers space and data factors. Moreover in multicast technology, for the space factor, there are several multicast routing algorithms, for example Double-Channel XY Multicast Wormhole Routing (DCXY) [ 20 ], Dual-Path Multicast Routing (DPM) [ 24 ], RCWP, OCXYP, RCXYP, etc. Among these approaches, the DCXYP is the most popular, the routing way just as our SPACE approach.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%