2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12061012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Multi-View Semi-Supervised Learning for Very High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image Classification

Abstract: Traditional classification methods used for very high-resolution (VHR) remote sensing images require a large number of labeled samples to obtain higher classification accuracy. Labeled samples are difficult to obtain and costly. Therefore, semi-supervised learning becomes an effective paradigm that combines the labeled and unlabeled samples for classification. In semi-supervised learning, the key issue is to enlarge the training set by selecting highly-reliable unlabeled samples. Observing the samples from mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Shi et al [16], a hierarchical multi view semi supervised learning framework with CNN (HMVSSL) is presented to remote sensing image classification. Initially, a super pixel based sample enlargement technique is projected to raise the amount of trained instances in every view.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Shi et al [16], a hierarchical multi view semi supervised learning framework with CNN (HMVSSL) is presented to remote sensing image classification. Initially, a super pixel based sample enlargement technique is projected to raise the amount of trained instances in every view.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The valuable detailed information in VHRRS images can interfere with the extraction of object boundaries because the boundaries of multi-scale segmentation may not completely match those of objects. Only the center pixel of each object is selected and added to the training set to avoid mislabeling samples due to the incorrect extraction of segmentation object boundaries [21]. In the following sections, we describe in detail how to assign the label to the center pixel.…”
Section: Training Sample Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is challenging to examine the training of classifiers with limited samples for the interpretation of remote sensing images [16]. Many scholars have explored methods to reduce the dependence of models on samples, such as transfer learning [17], few-shot learning [18], semi-supervised learning [19][20][21][22], unsupervised learning [23,24], and weakly supervised learning [25,26], and have achieved favorable results. However, the performance of these methods is not comparable to that of supervised learning methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads, inevitably, to a low accuracy particularly with a missed or incomplete ground truth. To overcome this problem, Shi et al propose an hierarchical multi-view learning framework based on CNNs [23]. Aydav et al use granular computing to improve classification [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%