2022
DOI: 10.1177/09544070221084434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical mode optimization strategy for gear engagement process of automated manual transmission with electromagnetic actuator

Abstract: When vehicles equipped with automated manual transmission (AMT) are in the gear engagement process (GEP), the problems of longitudinal shift jerk and synchronizer wear deterioration is prominent, which seriously affects the GEP quality. This paper develops and evaluates a hierarchical mode optimization strategy (HMOS) for GEP. Firstly, the models of gear-shift actuator and three-stage GEP are established, and the correlation between sleeve displacement and cone torque is revealed based on the established model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between simulation and experimental results validates the effectiveness of the proposed control approach, offering a novel solution for AMT gear-shifting systems. The authors of a study (Tao P et al [16]) developed a hierarchical pattern optimization strategy (HMOS) for AMT gear junction, wherein GEP models were established for the shift actuator and three stages to reveal the In the examination of the AMT shift process, scholars have generally categorized it into six stages [1,8,9] and provided detailed descriptions and analyses for each stage. The conventional AMT shift control involves the engagement of the target gear by the shift actuator after the completion speed adjustment (when the difference between sleeve speed and target gear speed reaches a certain threshold).…”
Section: Survey Of Amt Shift Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison between simulation and experimental results validates the effectiveness of the proposed control approach, offering a novel solution for AMT gear-shifting systems. The authors of a study (Tao P et al [16]) developed a hierarchical pattern optimization strategy (HMOS) for AMT gear junction, wherein GEP models were established for the shift actuator and three stages to reveal the In the examination of the AMT shift process, scholars have generally categorized it into six stages [1,8,9] and provided detailed descriptions and analyses for each stage. The conventional AMT shift control involves the engagement of the target gear by the shift actuator after the completion speed adjustment (when the difference between sleeve speed and target gear speed reaches a certain threshold).…”
Section: Survey Of Amt Shift Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between simulation and experimental results validates the effectiveness of the proposed control approach, offering a novel solution for AMT gear-shifting systems. The authors of a study (Tao P et al [16]) developed a hierarchical pattern optimization strategy (HMOS) for AMT gear junction, wherein GEP models were established for the shift actuator and three stages to reveal the relationship between sleeve displacement and friction cone torque. At the top layer of the HMOS, a novel sliding mode predictive controller (SMPC) with constraints was proposed for making tapered torque decisions during the GEP synchronization phase.…”
Section: Survey Of Amt Shift Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The speed synchronization process of the synchronizer is an important link in the shifting process. In most articles, the contact reaction force generated between the locking ring and the gear ring during the synchronization stage is a constant value, and the resulting friction torque, namely, the synchronization torque, is a constant value [29,30]. However, in fact, contact reaction force during synchronization is a complex process that gradually increases from 0 to shift force [31,32].…”
Section: Synchronizer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%