2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3007944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Load Balancing and Clustering Technique for Home Edge Computing

Abstract: The edge computing system attracts much more attention and is expected to satisfy ultra-low response time required by emerging IoT applications. Nevertheless, as there were problems on latency such as the emerging traffic requiring very sensitive delay, a new Edge Computing system architecture, namely Home Edge Computing (HEC) supporting these real-time applications has been proposed. HEC is a threelayer architecture made up of HEC servers, which are very close to users, Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) serve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These schemes, i.e., a nearest offloading algorithm and a predictive offloading algorithm, optimize the offloading decisions for each vehicle to complete its computation task, i.e., executing locally, offloading to Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) server connected to roadside units, and offloading to remote cloud server. To reduce the processing time for IoT requests on local servers, Babou et al [41] present a hierarchical cluster-based load-balancing system. The authors propose a three-layer architecture made up of edge servers, MEC servers, and central cloud.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These schemes, i.e., a nearest offloading algorithm and a predictive offloading algorithm, optimize the offloading decisions for each vehicle to complete its computation task, i.e., executing locally, offloading to Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) server connected to roadside units, and offloading to remote cloud server. To reduce the processing time for IoT requests on local servers, Babou et al [41] present a hierarchical cluster-based load-balancing system. The authors propose a three-layer architecture made up of edge servers, MEC servers, and central cloud.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the solid contributions in the aforementioned studies on IoT service placement, the proposed approach in this paper is distinguished as highly decentralized (Novelty 1) and is designed for scalable IoT networks. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge [42], most of the existing resource management schemes [11], [13], [28]- [36], [40], [41] only study one objective (e.g., load-balancing, minimizing monetary cost) in the context of IoT service provisioning. In contrast, the present research studies two opposing objectives (Novelty 2) that can be extended to account for any criteria regarding the preferences of users or service providers such as energy-saving.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the forthcoming MEC/RAN integration, current literature includes a noteworthy amount of MEC clustering techniques that incorporate different optimization criteria, such as minimizing end-to-end delay of MEC services [26], reducing traffic congestion within the MEC cluster [27], enhancing MEC service coverage [28], or offloading core network traffic to the edge MEC nodes [29]. Given the vast literature in the area, in this work, we choose not to focus on how to form a MEC cluster.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sequel, we term the proposed strategy as the Bound and Bound 0/1 Multiple Knapsack Problem (BB-ZOMKP) strategy and present it in the pseudocode form of Algorithm IV-B. The proposed BB-ZOMKP strategy consist of four main parts: Initialize (steps 4-8), BaselinePlacement (steps 9-24), ContentPlacement (steps [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and Backtrack (steps 41-56).…”
Section: ) Proposed Bound-and-bound Content Placement Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Η ονοµασία τους πϱοκύπτει από το γεγονός ότι η µεγαλύτεϱη ανάγκη για υπολογιστική ισχύ ϐρίσκεται συνήϑως στους τελικούς κόµβους, ή αλλιώς στις ακµές του δικτύου. Η χρονοδροµολόγηση εργασιών σε τέτοια συστήµατα µποϱεί να γίνει αρκετά πολύπλοκη καθώς πϱέπει να υποστηριχθούν πολυάριθµοι ετερογενείς κόµβοι, δυναµική µετάθεση εργασιών σε συστήµατα Υπολογιστικού Νέφους όταν υπάρχει ανάγκη για περισσότερη υπολογιστική ισχύ καθώς και δυνατότητες προσαρµογής στην συνεχώς εναλλασσόµενη δοµή του δικτύου [138][139][140].…”
Section: μελλοντική ΄εϱευναunclassified