2022
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2022.2133491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical linear modelling of educational outcomes in secondary schools: What matters – teachers’ or administrators’ input?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three-factor Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model of the Questionnaire According to Owan et al (2021), the CFA "determines the accuracy with which variables measure their respective factors (constructs); assesses the acceptability or otherwise of hypothesized models based on theoretical models; verifies the existence of relationships established by the EFA between observed variables (indicators) and their supposed constructs" (p. 11). Furthermore, a CFA was conducted to confirm the EFA's results and gauge the theoretical models' acceptance (Ekpenyong, et al, 2022;Owan, Owan, & Lata,2022). The Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation technique was used for the CFA analysis in the current study, with the result presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-factor Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model of the Questionnaire According to Owan et al (2021), the CFA "determines the accuracy with which variables measure their respective factors (constructs); assesses the acceptability or otherwise of hypothesized models based on theoretical models; verifies the existence of relationships established by the EFA between observed variables (indicators) and their supposed constructs" (p. 11). Furthermore, a CFA was conducted to confirm the EFA's results and gauge the theoretical models' acceptance (Ekpenyong, et al, 2022;Owan, Owan, & Lata,2022). The Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation technique was used for the CFA analysis in the current study, with the result presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a need to develop and validate the tools due to the unavailability of a previously developed instrument to measure the variables of this study, especially in the study's context. The EOQ was designed to measure students' affective and psychomotor outcomes (See Ekpenyong et al, 2022;, while students' cognitive outcome was measured using average scores from their sessional results. The FIQ (four points scale) had 13 items, CIQ (four points scale) had 18 items, and the EOQ (six points scale) had 30 items.…”
Section: Measures and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 3 and 4 show that the CFA loadings per construct were almost identical to those of the EFA. The CFA figure for the EOQ can be found in two studies from the same project (Ekpenyong et al, 2022;. The fit of the CFA models was evaluated using several fit indices such as the Chi-Square, GFI ("Goodness of Fit Index"), NFI ("Normed Fit Index"), RFI ("Relative Fit Index"), IFI ("Incremental Fit Index"), TLI ("Tucker-Lewis Index"), CFI ("Comparative Index"), and RMSEA ("Root Mean Square Error of Approximation").…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These outcomes are important because they impact students' ability to succeed in school and their future careers and reflect the education system's effectiveness. Learning outcomes are measured by the quality of students' cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills after exposure to lesson contents and experiences in the short-or long-term (Ekpenyong et al, 2022;. Cognitive learning outcomes refer to students' knowledge, understanding, and intellectual development from their educational experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%