2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical line matching based on Line–Junction–Line structure descriptor and local homography estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For known fundamental matrix, the local homography between a pair of junctions can be estimated to produce more accurate results and refining epipolar geometry meanwhile [36]. These results are very related to recent approach for the hierarchical line segment matching approach LJL [15]. In this work, detected line segments are used to generate junctions with virtual intersections in the first stage.…”
Section: Junction Matchingmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For known fundamental matrix, the local homography between a pair of junctions can be estimated to produce more accurate results and refining epipolar geometry meanwhile [36]. These results are very related to recent approach for the hierarchical line segment matching approach LJL [15]. In this work, detected line segments are used to generate junctions with virtual intersections in the first stage.…”
Section: Junction Matchingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There has been many approaches such as Canny edge detector [37] and line segment detector (LSD) [16,17] to extract line segments. LSD, which can produce more complete line segments than canny edge without any parameter tuning procedure, has been applied in many tasks such as line-segments matching [15] and 3D reconstruction [38]. Compared with key-points, line-segments can produce more complete result that contain the primary sketch for the scene.…”
Section: Indoor Image Matching With Geometric Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Meltzer and Soatto worked on point-like local affine invariant matching [20], which has a good matching effect for large viewing angles, but which is not good at dealing with non-coplanar and complex 3D-structured scenes. Moreover, the two adjacent line segment methods proposed by Li et al construct ray-point-ray [21] and line-juncture-line [22] structure descriptors. In this method, structured line segments in the first image are used to match with other structured line segments in the second image, so the robustness is relatively strong, and good matching results are achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%