2006 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2006.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Language Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Corpora

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, instead of capturing the associations at the document level, they may be estimated at the paragraph or snippet level [7,20,24]. Other extensions incorporate additional forms of evidence through the use of priors [14], document structure [33], hierarchical, organizational, and topical context and structure [6,23], and Web data [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, instead of capturing the associations at the document level, they may be estimated at the paragraph or snippet level [7,20,24]. Other extensions incorporate additional forms of evidence through the use of priors [14], document structure [33], hierarchical, organizational, and topical context and structure [6,23], and Web data [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two models have been first formalized and extensively compared by Balog et al [5], and are called candidate and document models, or Model 1 and Model 2, respectively. Candidate-based approaches (also referred to as profile-based [14] or query-independent [23] methods) build a textual (usually term-based) representation of candidate experts, and rank them based on a query/topic, using traditional ad-hoc retrieval models. The other type of approach, document-based models (also referred to as query-dependent approaches [23]), first find documents which are relevant to the topic, and then locate the associated experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the latter approach looks similar to the classic query expansion from a document collection (Lavrenko and Croft, 2001), since most relevant documents in most relevant profiles will supposedly be among the top retrieved documents from the collection anyway. Query expansion from organizational documents is actually popular in expert finding research and appears in works of Petkova and Croft (2006) and Balog et al (2008b) …”
Section: Document and Profile-based Query Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, they suggested using topical profiles and ranked candidate experts by the richness of their profiles in topics expressed in a query (Balog and de Rijke, 2007b). Petkova and Croft (2006) grouped documents by type/format and weighted the contribution of documents from each group to a candidate's profile.…”
Section: Profile-based Expert Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%