2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2018.8512677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Graphical Models for Context-Aware Hybrid Brain-Machine Interfaces

Abstract: We present a novel hierarchical graphical model based context-aware hybrid brain-machine interface (hBMI) using probabilistic fusion of electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic (EMG) activities. Based on experimental data collected during stationary executions and subsequent imageries of five different hand gestures with both limbs, we demonstrate feasibility of the proposed hBMI system through within session and online across sessions classification analyses. Furthermore, we investigate the context… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While EEG alone may not be capable of discriminating a large number of intended grasp types, supplementing EMG evidence with EEG may lead to improved intent inference in the case of some amputations. Ozdenizci et al [19] demonstrated that five particular hand gestures (four of them grasp types) can be reliably inferred from EEG, and they provide a reasonable initial coverage of the grasp taxonomy variety established by Feix et al [5]. Specifically, these five grasp types, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Data Annotationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While EEG alone may not be capable of discriminating a large number of intended grasp types, supplementing EMG evidence with EEG may lead to improved intent inference in the case of some amputations. Ozdenizci et al [19] demonstrated that five particular hand gestures (four of them grasp types) can be reliably inferred from EEG, and they provide a reasonable initial coverage of the grasp taxonomy variety established by Feix et al [5]. Specifically, these five grasp types, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Data Annotationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The quality of EMG signals may dramatically vary across individuals depending on the specifics of their amputation. Some studies also investigated the possibility of complementing EMG with electroencephalography (EEG) signals to improve inference accuracy [2,9,15,19]; however, in many practical situations the added information from EEG does not have significant impact on performance. Both EMG and EEG models may need frequent calibration to account for signal nonstationarity due to various factors, such as electrode locations or skin conductance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of BCIs, we argue that hierarchical arrangement of one-versus-rest binary sub-problems can be represented by an intuitive ordering rather than an arbitrary one. For instance in hand gesture decoding, upper hierarchical levels can discriminate the choice of hand and palm opening, whereas lower levels will be decoding power versus precision grasp type, or thumb abduction versus adduction of a specific grasp [39]. This decomposition provides an application specific multi-class decoding scheme which we demonstrate in Section IV.…”
Section: A Hierarchical Graphical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As proved in [9], some of the grasp tasks are very similar with the others and most of them could be handled successfully by several ones of all the 33 gestures. Moreover, it has been shown in [22] that, EEG signals are only capable of classifying 5 specic grasp types. Thus, for the future fusion with the EEG control, the label set is limited to 5 gestures: Open Palm, Medium Wrap, Power Sphere, Parallel Extension and Palmar Pinch, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Set-up and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newest myoelectrical activity-based designs of the prosthetic hand demonstrate promising results for patients with hand and wrist amputation, but the quality of the muscle activity signals decreases dramatically as amputation severity increases. Recent evidence indicates that decient electromyogram (EMG) activity could be compensated by electroencephalogram (EEG) signals [1,14,19,22], but because of the lower signal-to-noise ratio of EEG data, the results are still not sucient for real-world problems. Additionally, frequent calibration of the system is required to account for sensor sensitivity to external factors, such as electrode locations and skin variabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%