2021
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2020.2994192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Game for Networked Electric Vehicle Public Charging Under Time-Based Billing Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 1, the individual blocks K i F represent the cost minimizing controllers in charge of optimally splitting the ride-hailing fleets. Inspired by objective functions analyzed in [6], [7], [21], [22], we model the cost as the sum of three terms: the expected queuing cost, the charging cost, and the negative expected revenue.…”
Section: B Company's Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 1, the individual blocks K i F represent the cost minimizing controllers in charge of optimally splitting the ride-hailing fleets. Inspired by objective functions analyzed in [6], [7], [21], [22], we model the cost as the sum of three terms: the expected queuing cost, the charging cost, and the negative expected revenue.…”
Section: B Company's Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pricing mechanisms are usually studied in the context of maximizing revenue. Papers [6]- [8] model the charging stations as selfish revenue-maximizing agents, whereas [9] describes a game for modeling the regulatory aspects such as taxes and transportation prices as well as the operational matters for mobility service providers. From the perspective of congestion control in urban networks, different tolling mechanisms, congestion taxes, and congestion-aware routing schemes have been proposed in [10]- [13] based on the congestion game vehicle routing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a numerous number of EVs require charging is a major challenge for both scientists and companies. The goal is to reduce the impact on the power grid by solving the charging problem [3], [23]- [29] One such approach is MCSs known as a new type of EV charging equipment that offers charge service at any location and time requested [30], [31]. One main advantage of MCSs is that they can harvest idle energy from the grid efficiently by being charged from substations during off-peak hours or renewable resources [8], [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [8] proposes a non-cooperative game pricing strategy framework by the approach of profit-sharing and user equilibrium principles to maximize the social welfare of the electrified transportation system stakeholders consisting of electricity wholesalers, fast charging stations, and EV users, but this work also does not propose a closed form function to show how EVs select their desired CS for charging. The work in [9] is focused on the EV public charging market with heterogeneous CSs under the time-based billing model. In the proposed hierarchical game, each CS sets the charging price to maximize its own revenue first, then the EVs choose their desired CSs and determine the charging time; however, the power flow constraints, which affect the pricing strategy and relevant results, are not considered in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%