2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00503-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
240
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
240
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of this type of clustering in fMRI analysis has so far focused on grouping voxels into small, functionally homogeneous regions (Cordes, Haughton, Carew, Arfanakis, & Maravilla, 2002;Filzmoser et al, 1999;Goutte et al, 1999;Thirion & Faugeras, 2004). In contrast, here we demonstrate the benefit of using clustering to construct a top-down model of global patterns of activation spanning the entire brain.…”
Section: Other Data-driven Approachesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Application of this type of clustering in fMRI analysis has so far focused on grouping voxels into small, functionally homogeneous regions (Cordes, Haughton, Carew, Arfanakis, & Maravilla, 2002;Filzmoser et al, 1999;Goutte et al, 1999;Thirion & Faugeras, 2004). In contrast, here we demonstrate the benefit of using clustering to construct a top-down model of global patterns of activation spanning the entire brain.…”
Section: Other Data-driven Approachesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…To objectively separate the eta 2 profiles into groups, as done in Figure 3, hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on the eta 2 profiles to find any strong divisions among the set (Cordes et al, 2002;Dosenbach et al, 2007;Salvador et al, 2005). A '1-eta 2 ' calculation was used as a distance measure between the profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument corresponds to functional theories that assume that only one global functional state occurs at any given moment in time (Baars, 2002a;Efron, 1970). Similar arguments are used to justify spatial clustering procedures in other brain imaging modalities such as fMRI (Cordes et al, 2002), in intracranial animal studies (Stopfer et al, 2003), and even in vitro (Wagenaar et al, 2006), embedding the application of the microstate methodology into an overarching framework used to explain particular functional features of brain activity (discussed in detail in Section 5).…”
Section: Basic Assumptions Of the Eeg Microstate Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%