2012
DOI: 10.3182/20120711-3-be-2027.00318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Bayesian ARX models for robust inference

Abstract: Gaussian innovations are the typical choice in most ARX models but using other distributions such as the Student's t could be useful. We demonstrate that this choice of distribution for the innovations provides an increased robustness to data anomalies, such as outliers and missing observations. We consider these models in a Bayesian setting and perform inference using numerical procedures based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. These models include automatic order determination by two alternative methods, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 presents the results obtained by using BARX. The one-step-ahead predictors seem to perform well and this is reflected in a high model fit of 92.3% on validation data for the BARX model, which is a substantial increase from the model fit of 85.6% obtained in Dahlin et al [2012].…”
Section: Real-world Eeg Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 presents the results obtained by using BARX. The one-step-ahead predictors seem to perform well and this is reflected in a high model fit of 92.3% on validation data for the BARX model, which is a substantial increase from the model fit of 85.6% obtained in Dahlin et al [2012].…”
Section: Real-world Eeg Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, we revisit a real-world EEG data set analysed in Dahlin et al [2012], where the authors assume an ARX model with Student's t-distributed noise. We apply the same procedure as before to estimate the BARX model.…”
Section: Real-world Eeg Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, results in (8). Defining the likelihood in this way encourages soft competition such that only one expert is dominant in a certain region of the input space [14].…”
Section: Mixture Of Experts Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distribution has been used for robust estimation with outliers or atypical observations for many decades, see for example [4,5]. However, it is still a topic of ongoing research and has recently been employed for robust estimation in various fields: Gaussian processes [6], time series analysis using variational Bayes [7] and reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo [8], mixture models [9], mixture of regression models [10], mixture of autoregressive series [11] and mixture of experts using the expectation conditional maximisation [12]. In this paper the Student-t distribution is incorporated into a mixture of experts (MoE) Bayesian modelling framework so as to provide a novel approach to robustness to outlier data in piece-wise continuous data and bifurcating processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance Student-t distributions [12] or Laplace distributions [13]. The problem has been studied using time domain [14], [15], frequency domain [16], and subspace approaches [17]. Bayesian approaches for impulseresponse estimation in the presence of outliers have also been proposed [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%