Hidrolojik Model Kalibrasyonunda Uydu Tabanlı Aylık Buharlaşma ve LAI Verilerinin Kullanılması

Avcuoğlu, Muhammet Bahattin; Demirel, Mehmet Cüneyd

doi:10.18400/tekderg.1067466

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…LAI maps plant growth on low-resolution PET data. It is used to introduce the dynamics of PET and directly affects the results of AET [11]. Leaf Area Index (LAI) is taken into consideration at the L0 level and up-scaling from L0 to the L1 level.…”

Section: Meterologic Morphologic and Hydrologic Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various studies have assessed the importance of improving optimization procedures [5], choosing proper objective functions to appraise model performance [6], using probabilistic methods to take into account parameter uncertainty [7], calibrating the model to accommodate multiple targets [8], and selecting group of parameters which are part of step by step hydrologic process to meet various target [9,10]. Previous research [11] has established that LAI effect on AET. Much uncertainty still exists about the relationship between LAI and aspect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In bulk models, only output data can be evaluated. However, in fully distributed models' results can be get from anywhere of basin and compare with satellite-based remote sensing data [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These are Penman-Monteith method [14], Priestley-Taylor method [15], Hargreaves-Sammani method, aspect driven and LAI driven method. [11,16] Previous research comparing LAI and aspect has found. [11,17,18] No previous study has investigated both LAI and aspect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[11,16] Previous research comparing LAI and aspect has found. [11,17,18] No previous study has investigated both LAI and aspect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effect of Dynamic PET Scaling with LAI and Aspect on the Spatial Performance of a Distributed Hydrologic Model

Demirci¹,

Demirel²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The spatial heterogeneity in hydrologic simulations is a key difference between lumped and distributed models. Not all distributed models benefit from pedo-transfer functions based on soil properties and crop-vegetation dynamics. Mostly coarse scale meteorological forcing is used to estimate water balance at the catchment outlet only. Mesoscale hydrologic model (mHM) is one of the rare models that incorporates remote sensing data i.e. leaf area index (LAI) and aspect to improve actual evapotranspiration (AET) simulations and water balance together. The user can select either LAI or aspect to scale PET. However, herein we introduced a new weighting parameter “alphax” that allows user to incorporate both LAI and aspect together for PET scaling. With this mHM code enhancement, the modeler has an also option of using raw PET with no scaling. In this study, streamflow, and AET are simulated using the mesoscale Hydrological Model (mHM) in Main (Germany) basin for the period of 2002-2014. The additional value of PET scaling with LAI and aspect for model performance is investigated using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) AET and LAI products. From 69 mHM parameters, 26 parameters are selected for calibration using Optimization Software Toolkit (OSTRICH). For calibration and evaluation, KGE metric is used for water balance and SPAEF metric is used for evaluating spatial patterns of AET. Our results show that AET performance of the mHM is highest when using both LAI and aspect indicating that LAI and aspect contain valuable spatial heterogeneity information from topography and canopy (e.g., forests, grasslands, and croplands) that should be preserved during modeling. The additional “alphax” parameter makes the model physically more flexible and robust as the model can decide the weights according to the study domain.

show abstract

Section: Meterologic Morphologic and Hydrologic Datamentioning

confidence: 99%