2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2016.7752234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hiding in plain sight: Characterizing and detecting malicious Facebook pages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the research approaches are different depending on different OSNs, selecting the most suitable platform was the first most crucial step. Many researchers have addressed the problem of detecting identity clone attacks in a single platform, and the most common platform selections were Facebook [5]- [7], Twitter, Google+ [8], and LinkedIn. Moreover, some authors have used multiple platforms such as Google+ and Twitter and Facebook as their social environments [9], [10].…”
Section: A Motivation From Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the research approaches are different depending on different OSNs, selecting the most suitable platform was the first most crucial step. Many researchers have addressed the problem of detecting identity clone attacks in a single platform, and the most common platform selections were Facebook [5]- [7], Twitter, Google+ [8], and LinkedIn. Moreover, some authors have used multiple platforms such as Google+ and Twitter and Facebook as their social environments [9], [10].…”
Section: A Motivation From Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is probably going to assemble and examine the whole history all things considered; pages can adjustment execution after some time. To house such varieties in comportment, prescribed a self-versatile model which depends on the latest movement by the page [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers used n-grams as baselines for comparisons with their handcrafted features. Others used n-grams as features to their classifiers [36]. More recent papers [37][32] used word embeddings for language modelling, mainly the ones that are constructing a classifier using unsupervised learning.…”
Section: Nlp Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%