Hiding but hoping to be found: workplace disclosure dilemmas of individuals with hidden disabilities

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe workplace disclosure dilemmas of individuals with hidden mental health conditions who have privately accepted their mental health condition (anxiety and/or depression), but have chosen not to disclose it in their respective workplaces.Design/methodology/approachInterviews were conducted with 15 individuals who experience anxiety and/or depression. These individuals work across diverse organizations and sectors in India (e.g. architecture and health care). Data were analyzed using qualitative methods.FindingsInterviewees grappled with three dilemmas: professionalism versus authenticity (i.e. bringing only a partial professional self or the whole self to work), withdrawal versus participation (i.e. withdrawal from workplace interactions to conceal their condition or participation such that people could know of it) and personal privacy versus general advocacy (i.e. guarding one's privacy or engaging in advocacy for individuals who experience mental health conditions). Overall, findings suggest that the disclosure dilemma can stem from both one's internalized sense of a devalued self and by perceived contextual cues.Research limitations/implicationsFindings imply that perceived contextual conditions that amplify threat of discovery and its anticipated consequences can lead to and reinforce the disclosure dilemma. As individuals internalize others' constructions of themselves, they self-police and do not interrogate assumed normality within their social contexts.Practical implicationsEmployers can create inclusive environments. Present findings suggest some examples of inclusive practices such as the employment of dedicated resident counselors or counselors shared across organizations, training of stakeholders (including human resource personnel), allowing for selective disclosure (e.g. only to medical personnel) and cultivating informal support networks comprising similar others.Originality/valueSuch evidence-based research that can inform practices of inclusion for persons with a disability is especially important, considering that research on mental health conditions is conspicuous by its relative absence in mainstream management journals.

Negotiating the ambiguity of an (in)authentic working life: a grounded theory study into severe perineal trauma

“…In our study, the women struggled to disclose SPT at work, negotiating the ambiguity of ‘internalising shame’ and ‘externalising the trauma’. Similar ambiguity and dilemmas are presented in other studies [ 51 , 52 ] where workers struggle with disclosing chronic illnesses at work. Further, menstruation [ 53 ], pregnancy [ 54 ], and breastfeeding [ 55 ] are reproductive processes depicted as taboo in the workplace.…”

Reactions of applicants with disabilities to technology‐enabled recruitment and selection: A research agenda

“…It can be experienced as a dilemma in terms of when and how to disclose (Kulkarni, 2021) because the applicant must reveal personal information about themselves to obtain the benefits of an accommodation. Having to disclose a disability before one is ready can be related to lower fairness perceptions in two ways.…”

“…Disclosure is often conceptualized as a process (Chaudoir & Fisher, 2010) during which the person disclosing must decide to whom they should disclose, as well as what information and the level of detail to provide (Brohan et al, 2012). It can be experienced as a dilemma in terms of when and how to disclose (Kulkarni, 2021) because the applicant must reveal personal information about themselves to obtain the benefits of an accommodation. Having to disclose a disability before one is ready can be related to lower fairness perceptions in two ways.…”

Examining the impact of reasonable accommodation appraisals on New Zealand managers' attitudes toward hiring people with disability

“…Disability at work remains an under-investigated domain within organisational diversity research (Gould et al ., 2022), but a growing body of literature has made substantive contributions to our understanding of PwD experiences at work and of the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion (D&I) initiatives, including RA. This research has developed primarily around three main themes: (a) the lived experiences of PwD, spanning ableism, workplace relationships and employment outcomes (Carr and Namkung, 2021; Grześkowiak et al ., 2021; Lindsay et al ., 2022), (b) PwD views of the RA process and outcomes and the factors that influence their decision to disclose disability (Brzykcy and Boehm, 2022; Dong et al ., 2021; Kulkarni, 2022) and (c) disability support and inclusion practices in organisations (Gould et al ., 2022; Jansen et al ., 2022; Kwan, 2021). Yet, less is known about managerial attitudes toward hiring PwD, specifically how RA processes influence these attitudes, which has been noted as a significant gap in the literature (Bonaccio et al ., 2019; Cavanagh et al ., 2017; Suresh and Dyaram, 2022).…”