Hidden within a pandemic: how is international funding supporting mental health during COVID-19?

Abstract

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is bringing to light the long-neglected area of mental health. Current evidence demonstrates an increase in mental, neurological and substance use conditions globally. Although long-established as a leading cause of disease burden, mental health has been historically grossly underfunded. This analysis seeks to demonstrate the extent to which funding for mental health has been prioritised within the international COVID-19 response. Methods The authors analysed the development and humanitarian funding through data provided by the International Aid Transparency Initiative. Project-level COVID-19 data from January 2020 to March 2021 were reviewed for mental health relevance. Relevant projects were then classified into categories based on populations of concern for mental health and the degree of COVID-19 involvement. Financial information was assessed through project transaction data in US Dollars. Results Of the 8319 projects provided, 417 were mental health relevant. Mental health-relevant funding accounted for less than 2% of all COVID-19 development and humanitarian funding. Target populations which received the majority of mental health relevant funding were children and humanitarian populations, and 46% of funding went towards activities which combined COVID-19 responses with general humanitarian actions. Over half of mental health relevant funding was received by ten countries, and ten donor organisations provided almost 90% of funding. Conclusion This analysis shows that the international donor community is currently falling short in supporting mental health within and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. As the pandemic continues, sustainable country-led awareness, treatment, and prevention for mental, neurological and substance use conditions must be prioritised

Provision of mental health and psychosocial support services to health workers and community members in conflict-affected Northwest Syria: a mixed-methods study

“…First, the TWG should advocate for mainstreaming of MHPSS service packages and incorporating MHPSS outputs in the reimbursement of routine services to mitigate the intermittent funding of the MHPSS response. This call for sustainable funding models for MHPSS is critical in shock-prone settings such as NWS, especially given the tendency for shocks of different types (such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the cholera outbreak, and the recent earthquake) to shift international donor support away from MHPSS, despite the increasing MHPSS needs among already severely fragile communities [ 22 ]. Sustainable funding also breaks the cycle of resource scarcity, including attrition of trained staff, and helps build a resilient health system.…”

The Community Resiliency Model, an interoceptive awareness tool to support population mental wellness

“…The global need for simple, accessible, evidence-based mental health interventions existed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, with only a small fraction of those needing help ever receiving care (Campion, 2018 ). The pandemic exacerbated the crisis, engendering stress, anxiety, depression, insomnia, denial, anger, and fear (Torales et al, 2020 ), exposing defects in already fragile and inadequate systems of care (Auerbach and Miller, 2020 ; Gribble et al, 2022 ). Large-scale disasters, social turmoil, political conflict, climate change, population displacement, community violence, and structural racism all place population mental health at risk and underscore the need for mental health interventions that are effective, low-dose, transferrable, and sustainable (WHO, 2022 ).…”