2016 International Conference on Computation System and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/csitss.2016.7779371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden Markov model for POS tagging in word sense disambiguation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hidden Markov Model can help to find the probability of certain words and to predict the probability of remaining words in the sequence [9]. There are three processes Initialization which means getting the number of word labels, Transition of label search after the label is checked, and Emission of the number of words from the label from the training data.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hidden Markov Model can help to find the probability of certain words and to predict the probability of remaining words in the sequence [9]. There are three processes Initialization which means getting the number of word labels, Transition of label search after the label is checked, and Emission of the number of words from the label from the training data.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part-of-Speech (POS) information is important for disambiguating words with multiple meanings (Alva and Hegde 2016). This is because an ambiguous word carries a specific POS in a particular context (Pal, Munshi, and Saha 2015).…”
Section: Encoding Part-of-speech Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an upstream task that preprocesses the input texts to assist more complex NLP applications. Since the POS of a word can affect its meaning and polarity, POS tagging is important for downstream tasks, e.g., word sense disambiguation [12,343], information retrieval [201], sentiment analysis [333] T-News 76% F1 Table 2.4: Widely used corpora for POS tagging. [18,235], cyber-bullying detection [240], dialogue systems [23,223], metaphor detection [118,207] and interpretation [206,208].…”
Section: Pos Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%