2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.01119
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden Inverses: Coherent Error Cancellation at the Circuit Level

Bichen Zhang,
Swarnadeep Majumder,
Pak Hong Leung
et al.

Abstract: Coherent gate errors are a concern in many proposed quantum computing architectures. These errors can be effectively handled through composite pulse sequences for single-qubit gates, however, such techniques are less feasible for entangling operations. In this work, we benchmark our coherent errors by comparing the actual performance of composite single-qubit gates to the predicted performance based on characterization of individual single-qubit rotations. We then propose a compilation technique, which we refe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we test the effectiveness of a circuit level error mitigation technique called hidden inverse [47,48] to mitigate precisely this type of error. The key idea behind this error mitigation technique is that each self-inverse gate (such as CNOT) can be experimentally implemented in standard or inverted configuration.…”
Section: Reducing Noise With Hidden Inversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we test the effectiveness of a circuit level error mitigation technique called hidden inverse [47,48] to mitigate precisely this type of error. The key idea behind this error mitigation technique is that each self-inverse gate (such as CNOT) can be experimentally implemented in standard or inverted configuration.…”
Section: Reducing Noise With Hidden Inversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, many noise-adaptive quantum compilers have been proposed. For example, various gate errors can be suppressed by dynamical decoupling [8], [23], [35], [59], composite pulses [10], [40], [45], randomized compiling [60], hidden inverses [64], qubit mapping [34], [47], [57], instruction scheduling [48], [62], and frequency tuning [16], [26], [58]. Typically, the key to these techniques is to find opportunities for local error cancellation within a quantum circuit.…”
Section: B Noise-adaptive Quantum Compilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any asymmetry in the errors will affect the basis states differently and possibly cause certain states to not meet pseudo-threshold. For example, coherent errors are known to have a larger impact on smaller distance codes compared to larger distance codes [65] unless specifically designed to be robust against coherent errors [66][67][68][69][70][71]. We did not directly study coherent errors in this section since it would require full simulation and we leave such detailed comparisons to future work.…”
Section: B Quantum Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%