2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden genetic nature of epigenetic natural variation in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of mutated genes reported in Table 3 was based on DNA sequence changes, and we did not consider the number of genes that may have undergone changes in their expression owing to epigenetic variation. It has been reported that epigenetic variation is a result of genomic alterations such as CNV, genetic rearrangement, or transposon insertion; and that it affects the function of protein-coding genes (reviewed in Pecinka et al, 2013). Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that the expression of genes in the vicinity of the genomic rearrangements may be affected through alterations in epigenetic status or chromatin modifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The number of mutated genes reported in Table 3 was based on DNA sequence changes, and we did not consider the number of genes that may have undergone changes in their expression owing to epigenetic variation. It has been reported that epigenetic variation is a result of genomic alterations such as CNV, genetic rearrangement, or transposon insertion; and that it affects the function of protein-coding genes (reviewed in Pecinka et al, 2013). Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that the expression of genes in the vicinity of the genomic rearrangements may be affected through alterations in epigenetic status or chromatin modifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Genetic variation has been suggested to be associated with epigenetic variation, such as differential DNA methylation (26,27). We asked whether genetic variation is also associated with methylation interactions in F1 hybrids.…”
Section: Genetic Variations Between Col and C24 Associate With Methylmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating the insertion times of TEs responsible for the hypermethylation of genes may help to determine whether these insertions were contemporaneous to the WGD events, perhaps due to genomic shock. Also, highly methylated genes could be a path to pseudogenization followed by gene loss, but they may also serve as backup copies that may become demethylated and, under certain conditions, transcriptionally active (Pecinka et al, 2013). Collectively, genetic and epigenetic variation triggered by TEs may play an important role in the functional divergence of duplicated genes in soybean and common bean.…”
Section: Differential Methylation Among Duplicated Genes Can Serve Asmentioning
confidence: 99%