2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-019-09910-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden competence: women’s mathematical participation in public and private classroom spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, active learning was found to narrow achievement gaps between students from overrepresented and underrepresented groups by improving examination scores and passing rates for all student groups, but disproportionately so for those from underrepresented minorities (Theobald et al., 2020). However, it should be noted that active learning does not guaranty equity and instructors should be vigilant of inequity due to a number of factors including small group dynamics (e.g., Reinholz & Shah, 2018) or potential hidden biases (e.g., Ernest et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, active learning was found to narrow achievement gaps between students from overrepresented and underrepresented groups by improving examination scores and passing rates for all student groups, but disproportionately so for those from underrepresented minorities (Theobald et al., 2020). However, it should be noted that active learning does not guaranty equity and instructors should be vigilant of inequity due to a number of factors including small group dynamics (e.g., Reinholz & Shah, 2018) or potential hidden biases (e.g., Ernest et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such environments tend to support greater student learning in the aggregate (Freeman et al, 2014). However, a growing body of research also shows that active-learning environments may disproportionately benefit students who are already advantaged in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM; Bando et al, 2019;Ernest et al, 2019;Setren et al, 2019). These participatory inequities typically correspond to minoritized identities in STEM, say based on gender or race (e.g., Eddy et al, 2015;Ernest et al, 2019;McAfee, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a growing body of research also shows that active-learning environments may disproportionately benefit students who are already advantaged in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM; Bando et al, 2019;Ernest et al, 2019;Setren et al, 2019). These participatory inequities typically correspond to minoritized identities in STEM, say based on gender or race (e.g., Eddy et al, 2015;Ernest et al, 2019;McAfee, 2014). Thus, even though active learning may support student learning in the aggregate, as a matter of equity, it is imperative to create learning environments that do not disproportionately benefit already advantaged students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, ideas shared during whole-group discussions might actively mislead instructors in this regard. For example, some researchers have used cameras to monitor all small-group talk as well as all public, whole-class talk for four groups of students over an entire semester of geometry at a large, PhD-granting institution ( Ernest et al , 2019 ). They found that while high-quality discussion took place across small-group discussions, many of those important perspectives were absent from the whole-group sharing.…”
Section: Challenging Common Assumptions About the Share Component Of A Think-pair-sharementioning
confidence: 99%