In 1931 Koopman and von Neumann [1] proposed an operatorial formulation of Classical Mechanics (CM) expanding earlier work of Liouville. Their approach is basically the following: given a dynamical system with a phase space M labelled by coordinates ϕ a = (q i , p i ); a = 1, . . . , 2n; i = 1, . . . , n, with Hamiltonian H and symplectic matrix ω ab , the evolution of a probability density ρ(ϕ) can be given either via the Poisson brackets { , } or via the Liouville operator:The evolution via the Liouville operator is basically what is called the operatorial approach to CM. The natural question to ask is whether we can associate to the operatorial formalism of CM a path integral one, like it is done in quantum mechanics. The answer is yes [2]. In fact we can describe the transition probability P (ϕ a (2) t 2 |ϕ a (1) t 1 ) of being in configuration ϕ (2) at time t 2 if we were at time t 1 in configuration ϕ (1) via a functional integral of the formwhere ϕ a cl (t; ϕ (1) t 1 ) is the solution of the classical equations of motioṅ ϕ a = ω ab ∂H ∂ϕ b and δ is a functional Dirac delta which gives weight one to the classical paths and zero to the others. In the second line of (2), via some manipulations [2], we have turned the Dirac δ into a more standard looking weight whereThe λ a , c a ,c a are auxiliary variables with c a andc a of grassmannian character. The geometrical meaning of these variables has been studied in [2] and [3].