2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HH-MOTiF: de novo detection of short linear motifs in proteins by Hidden Markov Model comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we observed evidence for the presence of functional novel motifs and the recovery of known instances, computational de novo SLiM prediction remains a difficult challenge despite the plethora of available SLiM prediction methods, and thus the number of false positive predictions is expected to be high (Prytuliak et al, 2017). Our approach is vulnerable to additional uncertainties, which can be attributed to multiple confounders throughout our workflow in addition to the inherent false positive rate of the motif prediction method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although we observed evidence for the presence of functional novel motifs and the recovery of known instances, computational de novo SLiM prediction remains a difficult challenge despite the plethora of available SLiM prediction methods, and thus the number of false positive predictions is expected to be high (Prytuliak et al, 2017). Our approach is vulnerable to additional uncertainties, which can be attributed to multiple confounders throughout our workflow in addition to the inherent false positive rate of the motif prediction method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Truncation of the Euc1 CC domain abolished the interaction with Slx5 ( Fig EV3B) as well as Euc1 dimerization in Y2H (Appendix Fig S5C and D); however, Slx5 interaction was also lost by truncation of the region between aa 140 and 183, indicating a potential Slx5binding site in this region (compare Fig EV3B and Appendix Fig S5C, Euc1 1-140). To guide our search, we used HH-MOTiF for de novo motif prediction (Prytuliak et al, 2017) using Euc1 aa 81-183 and a set of putative Slx5 substrates as query. We introduced mutations in predicted binding sites downstream of the CC domain: Two of these strongly diminished binding to Slx5 while leaving dimerization intact (Slx5-binding mutant 1 and 2, SBM1: aa 139-143 ENQKK>ANAAA, SBM2: aa 162-165 KEVF>AAAA, Fig 5D and Appendix Fig S6A and B).…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we are looking for sequence motifs related to the positive class, we exclude motifs related to the negative class. Evaluation on ELM dataset: We compare the DiMotif performance with two recent motif discovery tools: (i) HH-Motif [26] as an instance of non-discriminative methods and (ii) DLocalMotif [30] as an instance of discriminative approaches. We evaluate the performances over the 20 problem settings related to 5 types of motifs in the ELM database.…”
Section: Dimotif Protein Sequence Motif Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…finding overrepresented protein sub-sequences in a set of sequences of similar phenotype (positive sequences). Examples of non-discriminative methods are SLiMFinder [23] (regular expression based approach), GLAM2 [24] (simulated annealing algorithm for alignments of SLiMs), MEME [25] (mixture model fitting by expectation-maximization), HH-MOTiF [26] (Hidden Markov Model (HMM) model based approach on multiple sequence alignment). Since other randomly conserved patterns may also exist in the positive sequences, reducing the false positive rate is a challenge for motif discovery [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation