2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hg2+ reduction and re-emission from simulated wet flue gas desulfurization liquors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is found, the reactions for Hg 0 emission are as follows, mainly through the pathway of mercuric-sulfite complexes (Eqs. (6), (7)) [30,31]:…”
Section: Effect Of Kmno 4 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is found, the reactions for Hg 0 emission are as follows, mainly through the pathway of mercuric-sulfite complexes (Eqs. (6), (7)) [30,31]:…”
Section: Effect Of Kmno 4 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,13 In an excess of sulphite ions, the formation of stable complexes such as Hg(SO 3 ) 2 2-or Hg(OH) 2 could have prevented Hg 0 re-emission during the first 120 minutes through Eq. 2 and 5.…”
Section: K 40ºcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Under conditions where Hg(SO 3 ) 2 2-predominated, the rate of reduction of the mercuric ion to Hg 0 via coordinated sulphite showed an inverse dependence with the concentration of uncoordinated sulphite, whereas it was unaffected by the amount of sulphite liberated by dissociation. In addition to the influence of sulphur species, the kinetics of mercury reduction reactions in the scrubber are affected 13,15,16 In this paper the stability of Hg 2+ in the absorbing solutions with sulphite ions and different anions was evaluated by analyzing the re-emission of mercury, pH and redox potential simultaneously. The objective of this work was to assess the role of sulphate, nitrate, chloride, fluoride and carbonate anions on the re-emission of mercury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insoluble Hg 0 passes through WFGD without being captured. Chemical reduction of the dissolved Hg 2+ reduces total mercury removal efficiency in WFGD due to re-volatilization of Hg 0 (Wo et al, 2009;Ochoa-González et al, 2013). Flue gas and slurry composition, operating temperature, limestone injection rate, and slurry pH are the key factors affecting the re-volatilization of Hg 0 (Acuña-Caro et al, 2009;Ochoa-González et al, 2012;Schuetze et al, 2012).…”
Section: Mercury Transformation During Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (mentioning
confidence: 99%