2013
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.714584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HF wastewater remediation by electrocoagulation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the higher affinity of aluminum coagulants comparing with iron ones towards fluoride [9,39].…”
Section: Effect Of Anodic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is likely due to the higher affinity of aluminum coagulants comparing with iron ones towards fluoride [9,39].…”
Section: Effect Of Anodic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies confirm that the relative performance of the anode material is variable and depends on the nature of target pollutant to be removed [19]. By using aluminium as anodes, many researchers found that EC is efficient as polishing treatment for fluoride removal after lime precipitation [1,9,10,20,21], while iron anodes gave less sufficient fluoride removal efficiency [9]. Similarly, EC is very common for chromium(VI) removal [12,22,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations