2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66322009000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexene catalytic cracking over 30% sapo-34 catalyst for propylene maximization: influence of reaction conditions and reaction pathway exploration

Abstract: -Higher olefins are produced as a by product in a number of refinery processes and are one of the potential raw materials to produce propylene. In the present study, FCC model feed compound was considered to explore the olefin cracking features and options to enhance propylene using 30% SAPO-34 zeolite as catalyst in a micro-reactor. The superior selectivity of propylene (73 wt%) and higher total olefin selectivity was obtained over 30% SAPO-34 catalyst than over Y or ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts. The thermodynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethylene yield increased slightly as C/N ratio increased up to about 3.0 and then remained constant as the C/N was further increased. At lower C/N, ethylene was produced by direct catalytic cracking and by secondary cracking of propylene [22].…”
Section: Catalytic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethylene yield increased slightly as C/N ratio increased up to about 3.0 and then remained constant as the C/N was further increased. At lower C/N, ethylene was produced by direct catalytic cracking and by secondary cracking of propylene [22].…”
Section: Catalytic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAPO-34 was prepared by mixing Al 2 O 3 :P 2 O 5 :SiO 2 :TEA:H 2 O in the molar ratio of 1:1:0.5:2:100, details are available elsewhere [20][21][22]. SAPO-34 was palletized with a binder Al 2 O 3 in 20 wt.% [23,24].…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having higher light olefin yields, lower energy consumption, and wider feed scope are a number of advantages of this process over conventional steam cracking. The catalytic pyrolysis feeds include butane [1,2] or heavier alkanes [3,4], butene [5,6] or heavier olefins [7][8][9], 5 raffinate [10], natural gasoline [11], naphtha [12,13], fluid catalytic cracking naphtha [14,15], coker naphtha [15], gas oil [16,17], heavy oil [18,19], waste tire [20], plastic mixture [21], and bio-oil or biomass [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%