2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on treated sawdust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
128
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
12
128
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to availability of more biosorbent sites as well as enhanced surface area [41]. The decrease in the rate of Cr (VI) uptake at adsorbent dose greater that 2 mg/L may be due to competition of the Cr (VI) ion for the sites available [42]. Similar results are also reported by researchers for a variety of batch experiments on sorption [29,36,[43][44][45].…”
Section: Effect Of Biosorbent Dosage On Cr (Vi) Uptakesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is due to availability of more biosorbent sites as well as enhanced surface area [41]. The decrease in the rate of Cr (VI) uptake at adsorbent dose greater that 2 mg/L may be due to competition of the Cr (VI) ion for the sites available [42]. Similar results are also reported by researchers for a variety of batch experiments on sorption [29,36,[43][44][45].…”
Section: Effect Of Biosorbent Dosage On Cr (Vi) Uptakesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The drop in adsorption capacity is basically due to the sites remaining unsaturated during the adsorption. Similar trend has also been reported by chromium (VI) adsorption onto sawdust [8]. The adsorption of silver ion onto blend chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol resin occurred due to free lone pairs electrons on the amino nitrogen are suitable for coordination with silver ion to give the corresponding adsorbent-metal complex [9].…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentalsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…where, B is a constant and F is the fractional attainment of equilibrium at time t in (8). International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol.…”
Section: Kinetics Of Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is shown, the optimum pH of solution was observed at pH of 2 and by increasing pH, a drastic decrease in adsorption percentage was observed. This might be due to the weakening of electrostatic force of attraction between the oppositely charged adsorbate and adsorbent that ultimately lead to the reduction in sorption capacity (Baral et al, 2006 …”
Section: Effect Of Ph On Chromium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%