2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexavalent chromium removal by various adsorbents: Powdered activated carbon, chitosan, and single/multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
9
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the particle size of commercial activated carbon was another important factor for improving the NH 4 + -N adsorption capacity of sandy soil. This result was in agreement with some studies on commercial activated carbon adsorbing other organic matter such as phenol, chromium, and humic acid [52][53][54]. So the smaller commercial activated carbon was, the better its adsorption capacity was, and the more influential its effects on sandy soil adsorbing NH 4 + -N in biogas slurry was [48,55].…”
Section: Effect Of Commercial Activated Carbon With Different Particlsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the particle size of commercial activated carbon was another important factor for improving the NH 4 + -N adsorption capacity of sandy soil. This result was in agreement with some studies on commercial activated carbon adsorbing other organic matter such as phenol, chromium, and humic acid [52][53][54]. So the smaller commercial activated carbon was, the better its adsorption capacity was, and the more influential its effects on sandy soil adsorbing NH 4 + -N in biogas slurry was [48,55].…”
Section: Effect Of Commercial Activated Carbon With Different Particlsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3b) may be related to the P adsorption of MLS materials. In this experiment, chitosan was used as local soil modifier, which has the P absorption ability (Jung et al, 2013;Xian, 2008). In contrast to the low initial TP removal, more than 63% of TN was removed from water column (inserted chart in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Nutrient Concentration and Its Ratio On Nutrient mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of heavy metal from aqueous solution consists of physical, chemical and biological techniques. Suggested conventional methods are electrochemical treatment, chemical precipitation, membrane technologies and adsorption on activated carbon [15][16][17]. Among all the methods, adsorption on activated carbon is considered to be one of the method for removal heavy metals from aqueous solutions have been reported earlier [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%