2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexavalent Chromium Generation within Naturally Structured Soils and Sediments

Abstract: Chromium(VI) produced from the oxidation of indigenous Cr(III) minerals is increasingly being recognized as a threat to groundwater quality. A critical determinant of Cr(VI) generation within soils and sediments is the necessary interaction of two low-solubility phases-Cr(III) silicates or (hydr)oxides and Mn(III/IV) oxides-that lead to its production. Here we investigate the potential for Cr(III) oxidation by Mn oxides within fixed solid matrices common to soils and sediments. Artificial aggregates were const… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several viable remediation methods exist that are capable of driving this transformation, including Fe 2+ and dithionite [5], zero-valent iron [6][7][8], and green rust, a layered Fe(II)-Fe(III) hydroxide mineral. However, several recent studies [9][10][11] have investigated the regeneration of chromate from Cr(III) and Cr(III)-bearing Fe(III) hydroxides in packed column experiments. These studies revealed that biogenic Mn(IV) oxides are the primary oxidant in these systems and that reductive transformation of chromate in soils may be reversible, depending on the Mn content and redox conditions of the soils as well as the solubility of the Cr(III)-bearing phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several viable remediation methods exist that are capable of driving this transformation, including Fe 2+ and dithionite [5], zero-valent iron [6][7][8], and green rust, a layered Fe(II)-Fe(III) hydroxide mineral. However, several recent studies [9][10][11] have investigated the regeneration of chromate from Cr(III) and Cr(III)-bearing Fe(III) hydroxides in packed column experiments. These studies revealed that biogenic Mn(IV) oxides are the primary oxidant in these systems and that reductive transformation of chromate in soils may be reversible, depending on the Mn content and redox conditions of the soils as well as the solubility of the Cr(III)-bearing phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For neutral to acidic waters, Cr(VI) adsorption may have an important, but, in the present study, undetermined, role in resulting groundwater contamination. Anaerobic conditions including microsites will likely further have pronounced influences on Cr(VI) levels [35], but were not considered in the present simulation. Our results therefore represent likely processes controlling Cr(VI) concentrations in groundwater for aerobic, alkaline environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mn oxides often coat advective boundaries, particularly in fracture rock such as saprolite where an influx of oxygenated water oxidizes Mn(II) catalyzed by mineral surfaces and Mn-oxidizing bacteria [33,34]. As described in Hausladen and Fendorf [35], studies conducted with synthetic aggregates show that in oxic waters with an influx of Mn(II), most biogenic Mn oxides precipitate within ca. 4.5 mm of the advective flow channel.…”
Section: Diffusion Distance Controls Time To a Steady-statementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hallett et al (2013) also point out that breakdown of soils by dynamic or static mechanical loading yields different fragmentations of soil aggregates. This dependence of the aggregate size distribution on the operational conditions under which it is measured raises the question of whether aggregates exist in soils in their natural state (Young et al, 2001), calling into question the extensive literature that tries to analyze the influence of aggregate size on various processes, e.g., in terms of the sequestration of OM, the distribution of bacteria, a wide range of geochemical processes, or the release of greenhouse gasses (Ranjard and Richaume, 2001; Jasinska et al, 2006; Nunan et al, 2006; Razafimbelo et al, 2008; Goebel et al, 2009; Pallud et al, 2010; Chivenge et al, 2011; Masue-Slowey et al, 2011, 2013; Blaud et al, 2014; Rabbi et al, 2014, 2016; Ebrahimi and Or, 2015; Jiang et al, 2015; San José Martínez et al, 2015; Sheehy et al, 2015; Hausladen and Fendorf, 2017; Rillig et al, 2017; Zhao et al, 2017; Bocking and Blyth, 2018; Li et al, 2018), and explaining perhaps why some authors have failed to observe anticipated correlations between OM content and aggregation (Razafimbelo et al, 2013). Nevertheless, one might argue that this dependence problem can be alleviated somewhat by standardizing methods, and that, in any event, it does not particularly affect attempts to understand at a very local scale in soils the interactions between pore geometry, chemical composition, and microbial activity.…”
Section: Progress On the Physical Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%