2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.055202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexagons become the secondary pattern if symmetry is broken

Abstract: Pattern formation on the free surface of a magnetic fluid subjected to a magnetic field is investigated experimentally. By tilting the magnetic field, the symmetry can be broken in a controllable manner. When increasing the amplitude of the tilted field, the flat surface gives way to liquid ridges. A further increase results in a hysteretic transition to a pattern of stretched hexagons. The instabilities are detected by means of a linear array of magnetic Hall sensors and compared with theoretical predictions.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments and computations of Gollwitzer et al (2009) performed in a small container confirm this. However, experimental photographs presented, for example, in Reimann et al (2005), Groh et al (2007) indicate that the magnetically forced periodic free-surface deformation patterns observed in the central part of a wide container appear to extend almost to its physical boundaries, thus downplaying the importance of the edge effects. The plausible explanation of this drastic difference between free-surface and magnetoconvection experiments is that in the former case the focussing of a magnetic field under the curved fluid surface leads to a comparable or even stronger distortion of the applied field than that caused by the refraction of the magnetic field at the edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Experiments and computations of Gollwitzer et al (2009) performed in a small container confirm this. However, experimental photographs presented, for example, in Reimann et al (2005), Groh et al (2007) indicate that the magnetically forced periodic free-surface deformation patterns observed in the central part of a wide container appear to extend almost to its physical boundaries, thus downplaying the importance of the edge effects. The plausible explanation of this drastic difference between free-surface and magnetoconvection experiments is that in the former case the focussing of a magnetic field under the curved fluid surface leads to a comparable or even stronger distortion of the applied field than that caused by the refraction of the magnetic field at the edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast to the case of the static, tilted field instability [22], we could not fit the spatial modulation of the signal of the sensor array with periodic functions. This difficulty might stem from the higher complexity of the evolving pattern which can not fully be captured by a one-dimensional array, and the limited spatial resolution of the array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to measure the temporal evolution of the growing amplitudes we utilize a linear array of Hall sensors [22], which is sketched together with the experimental arrangements in Sec. II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20], as detailed in Ref. [21]. The effective permeability r is the geometric mean r = (1 + χ ta )(1 + χ ch ), where χ ta = (∂M/∂H) denotes the tangential susceptibility, and χ ch = (M/H) the chord susceptibility [1].…”
Section: Modeling the Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%