1988
DOI: 10.1016/0167-577x(88)90080-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexagonal close packed nickel powder: Synthesis, structural characterization and thermal behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particles of internal oxides form but extensive pits are absent where V is the molar volume of the respective phase, given as M/q where M is the molecular mass of the phase and q its density. The values used for the densities are q Al 2 O 3 = 3.987 kg m -3 [17], q Ni 3 Al = 7.399 kg m -3 [18] and q Ni = 7.372 kg m -3 [19]. This volumetric expansion initially develops a large compressive stress which is relaxed by creep of the relatively weak c matrix.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pit Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles of internal oxides form but extensive pits are absent where V is the molar volume of the respective phase, given as M/q where M is the molecular mass of the phase and q its density. The values used for the densities are q Al 2 O 3 = 3.987 kg m -3 [17], q Ni 3 Al = 7.399 kg m -3 [18] and q Ni = 7.372 kg m -3 [19]. This volumetric expansion initially develops a large compressive stress which is relaxed by creep of the relatively weak c matrix.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pit Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 5a it is noticed that the XRD pattern presents some peaks related to Ni and Mo crystalline phases in metallic state, typical of each powder. Moreover, in Figure 5b, it is noticed that the XRD pattern for the Ni-Mo alloy presents peaks related to MoNi 4 crystalline phase 11 , typical of the Ni-Mo alloys, peaks related to Ni crystalline phase and peaks related to MoC 2 crystalline phase 12,13 . This last phase is predominantly superficial and its amount was decrease after cleaning the sample surface.…”
Section: Structural Characterization By X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EBSD data was gathered using a Zeiss Supra 55 VP-FEG SEM operating at 20 keV with an HKL Channel 5 system and a Nordlys II CCD camera. Individual EBSD patterns were analyzed using crystallographic input structures of Ni-fcc, Ni-hcp (a ¼ 2.6515A, c ¼ 4.343A PDF#00-045-1027 [21] ), Ni 2 P, Ni 3 P, NiO, NiS, NiS 2 , and Ni 3 S 2 . The EBSD maps were taken with a step size of 10 nm per point with scans of 200 Â 200 steps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%