2022
DOI: 10.1111/2047-3095.12403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic smartphone usability evaluations of the mobile application NANDA, nursing interventions classification, and nursing outcomes classification customized for nursing home registered nurses

Abstract: PurposeWe aimed to evaluate the usability of a smartphone application consisting of standardized nursing language (SNL) using NANDA, Nursing Intervention Classification, and Nursing Outcome Classification for nursing home nurses.Data sourcesApplying convenience sampling, a total of 14 experts and 15 real users were invited to test and evaluate the smartphone application independently. For the usability evaluation of the developed application, the Korean version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale for expert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NOCs. The heuristic evaluation about engagement, functionality, aesthetics, efficacy, and informative and subjective sense of quality was validated from 14 experts about geriatric nursing and technology and 15 real RN users using the Korean version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale for experts and Mobile Application Rating Scale: User Version (Hee Ko et al, 2022;Lee, 2017) developed by Stoyanov et al (2015Stoyanov et al ( , 2016 and Shin and Jung (2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOCs. The heuristic evaluation about engagement, functionality, aesthetics, efficacy, and informative and subjective sense of quality was validated from 14 experts about geriatric nursing and technology and 15 real RN users using the Korean version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale for experts and Mobile Application Rating Scale: User Version (Hee Ko et al, 2022;Lee, 2017) developed by Stoyanov et al (2015Stoyanov et al ( , 2016 and Shin and Jung (2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%