1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0645(97)00050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotrophic protists in the Central Arctic Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
65
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
13
65
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The chl a concentrations and abundances of bacteria, viruses, phototrophic and heterotrophic flagellates and ciliates in the Arctic and Fjord communities examined were comparable to values reported in other Arctic studies (Sherr et al 1997, Lovejoy et al 2007, Säwström et al 2007b, Boras et al 2010. BP (bacterial production) was significantly lower in open Arctic waters than in Fjord waters (Table 1), where the temperature was higher.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the In Situ Arctic And Fjord Waterssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The chl a concentrations and abundances of bacteria, viruses, phototrophic and heterotrophic flagellates and ciliates in the Arctic and Fjord communities examined were comparable to values reported in other Arctic studies (Sherr et al 1997, Lovejoy et al 2007, Säwström et al 2007b, Boras et al 2010. BP (bacterial production) was significantly lower in open Arctic waters than in Fjord waters (Table 1), where the temperature was higher.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the In Situ Arctic And Fjord Waterssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Perhaps because of relatively high concentrations of labile DOM at this time of year, community respiration typically exceeds primary production, heterotrophic bacteria actively cycle labile DOM, and bacterial biomass is high (Cota et al 1996;Rich et al 1997;Sherr et al 1997), despite in situ temperatures remaining low and both bacterivory and viral mortality having a significant impact on bacterial production (Steward et al 1996;Sherr et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When assuming complete algivory, 32-55% and 20-60% of the annual primary production was consumed by ciliates in Disko Bay and the Kattegat, respectively. Furthermore, because heterotrophic dinoflagellates were found to be as important grazers as ciliates in both systems, it was concluded that protozooplankton at high latitudes are also important in the cycling of primary production and should be considered if carbon and nutrient cycling in these systems is to be understood.During the past decade it has been shown that ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates are abundant in arctic marine waters; these protists have higher growth capacities than copepods from the genus Calanus, which traditionally have been considered the principal grazers associated with high latitudes (Andersen 1988;Nielsen and Hansen 1995;Hansen et al 1996;Sherr et al 1997;Levinsen et al 2000a). Furthermore, adult and nauplii of the Calanus species have been shown to preferentially feed on ciliates and dinoflagellates (Barthel 1988;Ohman and Runge 1994; Levinsen et al 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade it has been shown that ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates are abundant in arctic marine waters; these protists have higher growth capacities than copepods from the genus Calanus, which traditionally have been considered the principal grazers associated with high latitudes (Andersen 1988;Nielsen and Hansen 1995;Hansen et al 1996;Sherr et al 1997;Levinsen et al 2000a). Furthermore, adult and nauplii of the Calanus species have been shown to preferentially feed on ciliates and dinoflagellates (Barthel 1988;Ohman and Runge 1994;Levinsen et al 2000b;Turner et al 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%