2016
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotopic Vascularized Joint Transfer in Mutilating Hand Injuries

Abstract: Heterotopic vascularized joint transfer is a useful technique to consider in cases of mutilating hand injuries. Improved recovery of prehensile function can be achieved with thoughtful design and execution, followed by proper patient education and rehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vascularized MCPJ transfers can be harvested from spare non-replantable fingers (homodigital or heterodigital) or the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) and includes concurrent transplantation of the associated ligaments, bones, capsule, and overlying skin with satisfactory outcomes [ 6 , 7 ]. Pedicle-based vascular joint transplants avoid the time and technical burden of microsurgical anastomosis compared to free joint transplants but still require meticulous dissection and may not always be anatomically available [ 5 , 8 ]. Long-term outcomes are better in complete joint compared to hemi-joint transplants due to better cartilage preservation, synovial safeguarding, and avoidance of incongruent joint surfaces and are preferred if obtainable [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vascularized MCPJ transfers can be harvested from spare non-replantable fingers (homodigital or heterodigital) or the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) and includes concurrent transplantation of the associated ligaments, bones, capsule, and overlying skin with satisfactory outcomes [ 6 , 7 ]. Pedicle-based vascular joint transplants avoid the time and technical burden of microsurgical anastomosis compared to free joint transplants but still require meticulous dissection and may not always be anatomically available [ 5 , 8 ]. Long-term outcomes are better in complete joint compared to hemi-joint transplants due to better cartilage preservation, synovial safeguarding, and avoidance of incongruent joint surfaces and are preferred if obtainable [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our patient, utilization of the middle finger metacarpophalangeal osteochondral remnant and the DIP joint were used to reconstruct the MCPJ of both the thumb and index, respectively. Though non-vascularized joint transfers carry a higher risk of deterioration and avascular necrosis, they can be an effective reconstructive option with good outcomes and patients may remain asymptomatic despite radiologic evidence of degeneration [ 5 , 8 ]. In the present case, the patient continues to demonstrate satisfactory outcomes six years following her injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 22 It may even be possible to design a small free flap or vascularized joint transfer to improve function. 23 More extensive injuries, such as skin and soft tissue defects, tendon loss, and proximal neurovascular injuries may require reconstruction and immediate soft tissue cover. Flaps, either distant or free, have advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] Reconstruction and restoration of function following mutilating hand injury poses a severe challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. [ 2 , 3 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%