2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotopic gastric mucosa of the proximal esophageal (HGMPE) and its potential role in pediatric dysphonia and dysphagia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of inlet patches ranges from 0.18 to 14%, though autopsy reports show an incidence of up to 70% [ 3 , 6 ]. Additionally, inlet patches are observed in the pediatric population with a prevalence of up to 5.9% [ 7 ]. The endoscopic detection of esophageal GH is dependent on the endoscopist’s awareness of GH [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of inlet patches ranges from 0.18 to 14%, though autopsy reports show an incidence of up to 70% [ 3 , 6 ]. Additionally, inlet patches are observed in the pediatric population with a prevalence of up to 5.9% [ 7 ]. The endoscopic detection of esophageal GH is dependent on the endoscopist’s awareness of GH [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La heterotopia de mucosa gástrica del esófago proximal (HMGEP), también denominada parche de entrada, es una entidad clínica poco entendida y probablemente subdiagnosticada (1). Su prevalencia varía ampliamente, reportándose entre el 0,2 % y el 13 % (2).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Su prevalencia varía ampliamente, reportándose entre el 0,2 % y el 13 % (2). Esta discrepancia puede deberse a que el diagnóstico es operador-dependiente y a que los síntomas faringolaríngeos suelen ser atribuidos al reflujo gastroesofágico (1). Como concluyen Chung y colaboradores en su estudio, la prevalencia aumenta cuando el operador realiza una búsqueda activa de la lesión, lo que sugiere que existe subdiagnóstico de este hallazgo en endoscopias de rutina (2).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified