1991
DOI: 10.3109/17453679108993596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotopic bone formation following hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study of 65 bilateral cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal reasons for the exclusion of studies were the absence of information about the incidence of heterotopic bone formation or about the number of participants or hips, 7,14 , 227−279 the conduct of other surgical procedures (e.g. cup arthroplasty, repair of hip fracture or resection of heterotopic bone formation), 2,216,280−298 repeat publication of data included in another report, 60,65,299−339 review articles with no original data, 1,3−6,8,12,340−363 data restricted to heterotopic bone formation at non‐hip sites, 11,364−381 and data restricted to heterotopic bone formation in non‐human species 382−388 . The reports from a number of other possibly relevant studies were not available for review 82,389−421 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal reasons for the exclusion of studies were the absence of information about the incidence of heterotopic bone formation or about the number of participants or hips, 7,14 , 227−279 the conduct of other surgical procedures (e.g. cup arthroplasty, repair of hip fracture or resection of heterotopic bone formation), 2,216,280−298 repeat publication of data included in another report, 60,65,299−339 review articles with no original data, 1,3−6,8,12,340−363 data restricted to heterotopic bone formation at non‐hip sites, 11,364−381 and data restricted to heterotopic bone formation in non‐human species 382−388 . The reports from a number of other possibly relevant studies were not available for review 82,389−421 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female wild-type mice formed significantly more BMP6-induced HO than male mice (Figure 6A), showing that the observed female-dominant sex difference in HO volumes is not restricted to FOP mice. We note that sex differences have been reported in non-FOP models of HO and in patients who experience non-FOP HO induced by various insults and disease states [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In these contexts, however, the sex difference is typically male-dominant.…”
Section: Biological Sex Impacts On Bmp-induced Ho and The Effect Of A...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Specifically, numerous clinical studies of non-genetic HO have reported male sex as a risk factor. Males exhibit both a higher incidence of HO and a more robust HO response after procedures such as cervical disk replacement/arthroplasty [6][7][8], hip arthroplasty [9,10], femoral intramedullary rodding [11], and injuries that include traumatic brain injury [12] and burns [13]. HO was observed exclusively in males following rhBMP7 treatment of long bone non-unions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,50 Clinical studies have shown that the NSAID indomethacin reduces heterotopic ossification in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. 2,15,21,26,28,29,[38][39][40]44 This effect was also reported to occur even if the patients were only treated with indomethacin in the first weeks following the operation. 27,46 There are also studies describing the influence of NSAIDs in osteogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%