2001
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141012x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotic Relationships among Nine Temperate and Subtropical Maize Populations

Abstract: The introgression of exotic germplasm could increase the heterosis among maize (Zea mays L.) populations. Our objective was to assess heterotic relationships among BSSS (R) (‘Reid’ germplasm) and BS 26 (‘Lancaster’ germplasm) from the temperate USA; the southern African cultivars Salisbury White, Southern Cross, and Natal Potchefstroom Pearl Elite Selection (NPP ES); and the subtropical CIMMYT Populations 34, 42, 44, and 47. The nine cultivars and their diallel crosses were evaluated at five Mexico, Zimbabwe, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These heterotic groups were presented in detail by Gevers and Whythe (1987) and Mickelson et al (2001). Drought tolerant lines were selected under managed drought environments at CIMMYT, in Zimbabwe.…”
Section: Germplasmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These heterotic groups were presented in detail by Gevers and Whythe (1987) and Mickelson et al (2001). Drought tolerant lines were selected under managed drought environments at CIMMYT, in Zimbabwe.…”
Section: Germplasmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, group A is thought to exhibit heterosis similar to N3, Tuxpeño, Kitale and Reid. Group B is thought to be exhibit heterosis similar to SC, ETO Blanco, Ecuador and Lancaster (Mickelson et al 2001). Materials deWned as being in group AB have high heterosis with both groups A and B germplasm.…”
Section: Genotype (Entry) By Environment Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the high mid-parent heterosis observed in most crosses, high parent heterosis (h ii , not shown but easily calculated from table 2) must be also taken into account, and only those crosses with high means should be considered. Thus, the best crosses for SY (AxB, and AxD) showed h ij and h ii (in parenthesis) values of 10.3% (7.7%) and 17.4% (16.1%) respectively, while for EY, (Miranda Filho and Vencovky 1984, Crossa et al 1990, PerezVelazquez 1995, San Vicente et al 1998, Bertoia 2001, Mickelson et al 2001, Reif et al 2003, Soengas et al 2006.…”
Section: Source Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 95%