2020
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ab734b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterostructural one-unit-cell FeSe/SrTiO3: from high-temperature superconductivity to topological states

Abstract: High-temperature superconductivity in one-unit-cell (1-UC) FeSe/SrTiO 3 heterostructure has become a research frontier in condensed-matter physics and material science. The superconducting transition temperature (T c ) of ultrathin FeSe film is significantly enhanced compared to its bulk counterpart and possibly approaches the liquid-nitrogen region according to in situ spectroscopic measurements. Particularly, the Fermi-surface topology of 1-UC FeSe consists of no hole pockets at Brillouin-zone center, which … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
(438 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FeSe with excess Fe was discovered to be an 8 K superconductor in 2008 [61], but a cold vapor deposition technique was required to reliably make high-quality, stoichiometric, crystals [60]. A summary of interesting properties of this compound has been provided in earlier reviews [24,62,63], reviews on monolayer FeSe can be found in references [64][65][66][67]. As for FeTe, it turns out to be the most stable compound of the 11 chalcogenides in its pristine form [22], which may, together with the presence of interstitial Fe, be responsible for the difficulty of making homogeneous samples doped with Se away from the FeTe point.…”
Section: How Fese Is Different From Pnictidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FeSe with excess Fe was discovered to be an 8 K superconductor in 2008 [61], but a cold vapor deposition technique was required to reliably make high-quality, stoichiometric, crystals [60]. A summary of interesting properties of this compound has been provided in earlier reviews [24,62,63], reviews on monolayer FeSe can be found in references [64][65][66][67]. As for FeTe, it turns out to be the most stable compound of the 11 chalcogenides in its pristine form [22], which may, together with the presence of interstitial Fe, be responsible for the difficulty of making homogeneous samples doped with Se away from the FeTe point.…”
Section: How Fese Is Different From Pnictidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the resulting band structure, the inverted parity-exchanged hole (electron) bands acquire p z /d xy (d xz /d yz ) orbital weight. For further details about the generations of topological bands in FeSCs monolayers, we refer to references [261,376] and recent reviews in references [25,67].…”
Section: Theoretical Proposals For Topological Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, orbitally selective pairing was discovered only in bulk FeSe, while the 2D-limit counterpart, one-unit-cell (1-UC) FeSe, , has been scarcely explored (section I in the Supporting Information). For 1-UC FeSe/SrTiO 3 (001), although the significantly high T c of 55–65 K has encouraged extensive investigations, the central pairing issues remain debated because of absent Γ-hole pockets. Concretely, the pairing is controversial mainly over s ++ -, incipient s ± -, extended s ± -, and nodeless d-wave, , partially suffering from the experimental challenge of effectively distinguishing different bosonic modes (e.g., spin fluctuations vs phonon) for mediating the coherent Cooper pairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the behavior of Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon states in the vortex core disfavors d-wave pairing [16,17]. On the other hand, the controversy over the two leading contenders, i.e., sign-preserving sand sign-changed s ± -wave, remains unresolved, despite extensive impurity-scattering investigations [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] including measurements employing the recently developed quasiparticle interference technique [18][19][20][25][26][27]. The conflict situation stems from the difficulties in proving the practical magnetic or nonmagnetic nature of the impurities under investigation [21] and distinguishing bound states under weak scattering potential [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%