2011
DOI: 10.3923/ajar.2012.21.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosis for Yield and Yield Components in Basmati Rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrids Rm-9-133 x Rm-9-126 (6.62 per cent) showed the highest heterosis over better parent and also recorded the highest standard heterosis of 9.72 per cent and 10.43 per cent over the checks Co-4 and GBM-1 respectively. Similar findings were also reported in greengram by Reddy (1998), Joseph and Santoshkumar (2000), Sawale et al (2003), Anbumalarmathi et al (2004), Kumar et al (2007), Barad et al (2008), Dhuppe et al (2010) and Reddy et al (2011).…”
Section: Crossessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The hybrids Rm-9-133 x Rm-9-126 (6.62 per cent) showed the highest heterosis over better parent and also recorded the highest standard heterosis of 9.72 per cent and 10.43 per cent over the checks Co-4 and GBM-1 respectively. Similar findings were also reported in greengram by Reddy (1998), Joseph and Santoshkumar (2000), Sawale et al (2003), Anbumalarmathi et al (2004), Kumar et al (2007), Barad et al (2008), Dhuppe et al (2010) and Reddy et al (2011).…”
Section: Crossessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…They suggested the importance of both additive and nonadditive gene effects in governing yield and most of the yield components. Similar results were published by KUMAR et al (2015), , PRADHAN et al, (2006) and VERMA et al, (2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings are in close agreement with the various workers who reported a standard heterosis of more than 20 per cent for grain yield increase over standard variety. Annadhurai and Nadarajan (2001), Janardhanam et al, (2001), , Datt and Mani (2004), Bhandarker et al, (2005), Malini et al, (2006), Eradasappa et al, (2007), Parihar and Pathak (2008), Venkatesan et al, (2008), Roy et al, (2009), Kumar et al, (2010), Tiwari et al, (2011) and Kumar et al,(2012), Dwivedi and Pandey, (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%