2016
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2015.11.0702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosis and Genetic Variance in Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Populations

Abstract: One of the greatest challenges in plant breeding is the selection of parental combinations that will produce progeny that are superior to either parent. The objective of this research was to determine if yield heterosis in the F2 bulk of a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] single cross is a predictor of significant genetic variance for yield and superior line yields among random inbred lines derived from the F2 generation. In one experiment, thirty‐seven F6:7 inbred lines from each of five bi‐parental populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that, at least for tobacco, evaluation of heterosis in the F 1 generation could be useful as a preliminary screen to select populations with an increased potential to yield positive transgressive segregants. In soybeans, early generation heterosis was found to be a predictor for genetic variance, but not transgressive segregation (Friedrichs et al, 2016). In our experiments, although positive relationships between F 1 heterosis and transgressive segregation were found, we observed inverse correlations between F 1 heterosis and genetic variance in derived families.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…It appears that, at least for tobacco, evaluation of heterosis in the F 1 generation could be useful as a preliminary screen to select populations with an increased potential to yield positive transgressive segregants. In soybeans, early generation heterosis was found to be a predictor for genetic variance, but not transgressive segregation (Friedrichs et al, 2016). In our experiments, although positive relationships between F 1 heterosis and transgressive segregation were found, we observed inverse correlations between F 1 heterosis and genetic variance in derived families.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] has shown similar properties (Burton and Brownie, 2006; Friedrichs et al, 2016).…”
Section: Hybrid‐enabled Line Profiling (Help)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In two experiments, Friedrichs et al (2016) compared the yield of the F 2 population with F 6 or F 7 lines derived from the F 2 population. In the first experiment, a set of five crosses was selected because the progeny had performed well in preliminary yield tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paschal and Wilcox (1975) using exotic germplasm found that even small levels of F 1 heterosis were rare. Friedrichs et al (2016) reported that F 2 heterosis was a good predictor of genetic diversity but may not have tested a sufficient number of lines to identify transgressive segregants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%