2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1222-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosis and combining ability in rice as influenced by introgressions from wild species Oryza rufipogon including qyld2.1 sub-QTL into the restorer line KMR3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials which are based on various mating designs and which are accompanied by statistical analysis not only differentiates between the effect of genetical and environmental factors but also partitions genetic influences into additive and non-additive components [32,34]. Such statistical analyses are possible only when an in-depth scrutiny of the relationship between combining ability of parental lines and per se heterosis of the novel hybrids is undertaken [35]. As opined by [36], combining ability is an estimate of the genotypic values of lines and testers in relation with their offsprings performance using a definite mating design, which is generally assessed through progeny testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials which are based on various mating designs and which are accompanied by statistical analysis not only differentiates between the effect of genetical and environmental factors but also partitions genetic influences into additive and non-additive components [32,34]. Such statistical analyses are possible only when an in-depth scrutiny of the relationship between combining ability of parental lines and per se heterosis of the novel hybrids is undertaken [35]. As opined by [36], combining ability is an estimate of the genotypic values of lines and testers in relation with their offsprings performance using a definite mating design, which is generally assessed through progeny testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a comparative analysis of hybrids has not been made before. Our previous work showed that the hybrid IR79156A/IL50-13 gave significantly high yield 43 g/plant and showed highest specific combining ability (SCA) for yield (6.04) among 36 hybrids and high standard heterosis over KRH2 (61.79%) and DRRH2 (50.23%) indicating predominance of non-additive gene action for grain yield heterosis in test hybrid 9,10 . Several studies showed that non-additive gene action is important for yield and yield related traits in rice hybrids [31][32][33] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest yielding top 11 of 67 hybrids which had introgressions from qyld2.1 showed 40.0-48.06 g yield per plant compared with respective control hybrids with 30.2-35.5.9 g 9 . An elite hybrid IR79156A/IL50-13 showed significantly high combining ability and standard heterosis for yield over popular hybrid DRRH2 9,10 . The test hybrid IR79156A/ IL50-13 (with O. rufipogon introgression) showed yield advantage of 32% over the control hybrid IR79156A/ KMR3 (without O. rufipogon introgression) during kharif season 2012 at IIRR (Indian Institute of Rice Research) farm, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In India, out of a total 44.15 million hectares under rice cultivation, hybrid rice occupies less than three million hectares [4]. Limited adoption of hybrid rice in India could be primarily attributed to the lower yield advantage of these hybrids over the conventional varieties, coupled with lack of good grain quality features in rice hybrids [5,56]. Therefore, in order to popularize the hybrids, there is an imminent requirement that the released novel hybrids have at least 20-30% yield advantage in comparison with the existing varieties along with the appropriate supporting policies for their better adoption [5,57,58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…physical position, 31.24 Mb, was earlier reported by [74] to possess a major QTL governing yield (GY) trait. As the two traits, PL and GY are positively correlated to each other [56,79], it is possible that a single candidate gene could be controlling both the traits. A second QTL hotspot region anked within the SSR markers, RM7023 (6.98 Mb) and RM586 (1.47 Mb) on chr 6 was observed to govern three traits namely YLD (qYLD6-1), FLL (qFLL6-1) and PL (qPL6-1)…”
Section: Qtl Hotspotsmentioning
confidence: 99%