2015
DOI: 10.3390/jmse3020267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterophil/Lymphocyte Alterations as a Measure of Stress in American Alligators in Relation to Anthropogenic Disturbance in a Louisiana Intermediate Marsh

Abstract: Numerous anthropogenic factors represent environmental threats to Gulf Coast wetland ecosystems and associated fauna. American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) have been subject to long-term management and used as ecological and physiological indicators of habitat quality in response to anthropogenic events and stochastic natural disasters. The present study monitored heterophil to lymphocyte ratios (an indicator of stress), in American alligators in a Louisiana intermediate marsh from 2009 to 2011, a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stressful conditions elevate levels of circulating glucocorticoids which are known to alter physiology such as shifting the profiles of circulating heterophils and lymphocytes (Sapolsky et al, 2000). Thus, we may consider the low H:L present in our alligators to indicate that these animals did not experience chronically stressful conditions (Lance et al, 2010; Murray et al, 2015), which may alter immune function (Sapolsky et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stressful conditions elevate levels of circulating glucocorticoids which are known to alter physiology such as shifting the profiles of circulating heterophils and lymphocytes (Sapolsky et al, 2000). Thus, we may consider the low H:L present in our alligators to indicate that these animals did not experience chronically stressful conditions (Lance et al, 2010; Murray et al, 2015), which may alter immune function (Sapolsky et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%