2014
DOI: 10.1177/1363460714531267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heteronormativity, homophobia and ‘culture’ arguments in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Abstract: Despite a progressive Constitution and affirming legislation, sexual and gender minorities experience discrimination in South Africa. This reflects the ongoing impact of heteronormativity, 'culture' arguments and violence in suppressing non-normative sexual and gender identities. In the present study we conducted interviews with eight young, lesbian women and gay men in eThekwini municipality in KwaZulu-Natal province. Three major themes emerged: Language and constructions of gender and sexuality; Experiences … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this space they feel comfortable using their bodies as vehicles to display their identity and express their thoughts and feelings without fear of being ridiculed or excluded. Beyond this physical space, however, the embodiment of homosexuality and not being able to pass as heterosexual is perceived as evoking risk (Reygan and Lynette 2014).…”
Section: Invisible Risky Bodies: Male Sex Workers' Experiences Of Viomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this space they feel comfortable using their bodies as vehicles to display their identity and express their thoughts and feelings without fear of being ridiculed or excluded. Beyond this physical space, however, the embodiment of homosexuality and not being able to pass as heterosexual is perceived as evoking risk (Reygan and Lynette 2014).…”
Section: Invisible Risky Bodies: Male Sex Workers' Experiences Of Viomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other countries beyond this ‘western’ picture, such as South Africa, Taiwan has the potential for being a valuable sociological case and for expanding intellectual dialogue on gender and sexuality (see, e.g. Ratele, 2016; Reygan and Lynette, 2014; Scott and Theron, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-colonial amnesia can be seen in the omnipresent non-recognition of queer identity as a legitimate axis of human difference (Bajaha, 2015). It manifests through a constant (re)construction of queer identity as a “foreign” western import, a lifestyle choice, biologically unnatural, religiously demonic, culturally un-African, and a medical or psychopathological phenomenon (Msibi, 2012; Reygan and Lynette, 2014; Engh and Potgieter, 2015; McEwen, 2016; Owen, 2016). These constructions produce a social reality in which queer existence triggers anxiety, discomfort, anger and violence (Reygan and Lynette, 2014; Engh and Potgieter, 2015) and give impetus to eugenic convictions that queer bodies deserve prevention, cure and or extermination (Academy of Science of South Africa, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It manifests through a constant (re)construction of queer identity as a “foreign” western import, a lifestyle choice, biologically unnatural, religiously demonic, culturally un-African, and a medical or psychopathological phenomenon (Msibi, 2012; Reygan and Lynette, 2014; Engh and Potgieter, 2015; McEwen, 2016; Owen, 2016). These constructions produce a social reality in which queer existence triggers anxiety, discomfort, anger and violence (Reygan and Lynette, 2014; Engh and Potgieter, 2015) and give impetus to eugenic convictions that queer bodies deserve prevention, cure and or extermination (Academy of Science of South Africa, 2015). Young (2014) posits that these oppressive discourses are not always imposed by cruel autocrats, but by a well-intentioned liberal society and organisations that may be acclaimed as diversity competent, through the ongoing formation of system-wide constraints, unquestioned norms, habits, symbols and daily language that restrains and diminishes the potential of (queer) others to be fully human (Reygan and Lynette, 2014; Engh and Potgieter, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%