1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5729(95)00008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterojunction band offset engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 291 publications
4
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several references that are used in the literature to determine the relative position of band edges [33][34][35][36]. The average electrostatic potential is the best common reference but it is very expensive to calculate as both materials of interest must be contained within one common simulation cell.…”
Section: B Band Edge Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several references that are used in the literature to determine the relative position of band edges [33][34][35][36]. The average electrostatic potential is the best common reference but it is very expensive to calculate as both materials of interest must be contained within one common simulation cell.…”
Section: B Band Edge Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, it is of utmost importance to assess the changes induced by OH vac in terms of both local and global polarizations across the tube section. Following [24], the change (∆V ) in the (microscopically) averaged electrostatic potential across the polarized interface can be related to the electrostatic dipole across the interface itself (µ) as ∆V = eµ/ǫ 0 . On this basis, it is straightforward to evaluate the actual dipole moment across the tube walls from ∆V values calculated in DFT.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the lateral dimension of the heterostructure happens to coincide with the average of the WZ and ZB lattice parameters. The valence band offset of the ZB and WZ segments can be computed 45 as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%