2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous twinning during directional solidification of multi-crystalline silicon

Abstract: Heterogeneous twinning nucleation from the wall or gas interface during directional solidification of silicon have been modelled, and further used to clarify the details of twining observed in situ in X-ray synchrotron imaging experiments [1]. It is found that the heterogeneous twinning from the wall/grains or wall/gas/grain trijunctions requires much lower undercoolings leading to much higher twinning probability. The lower attachment energy and the contact area are the key factors for the heterogeneous nucle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger facet angles relatively to the wall are calculated for the left {111} facet in Figure 7 so that it has a lower contact area with the crucible wall. Finally, both low attachment energy and lower contact area concur to a higher twining probability of 8 x 10 -7 on the left facet (facet 1 in reference [40]) compared to the a twinning probability of 8 x 10 -8 on the right facet (facet 2 in reference [40]). Thus, according to this model, the left {111} facet (Grain V in Figure 7) is the most thermodynamically favourable for the nucleation of a new grain.…”
Section: Spontaneous Grain Nucleation Inside the Grain Boundary Groovmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Larger facet angles relatively to the wall are calculated for the left {111} facet in Figure 7 so that it has a lower contact area with the crucible wall. Finally, both low attachment energy and lower contact area concur to a higher twining probability of 8 x 10 -7 on the left facet (facet 1 in reference [40]) compared to the a twinning probability of 8 x 10 -8 on the right facet (facet 2 in reference [40]). Thus, according to this model, the left {111} facet (Grain V in Figure 7) is the most thermodynamically favourable for the nucleation of a new grain.…”
Section: Spontaneous Grain Nucleation Inside the Grain Boundary Groovmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As seen above, the nucleation of the purple grain VI occurs on the left {111} facet of the grain boundary groove. The attachment energy and the contact area are the key factors for the heterogeneous nucleation of twins as modelled by Jhang et al [40]. This model was specifically applied to the particular experiment described here and to the grain boundary groove in Figure 7 (Case 1, model 1.1 in [40]).…”
Section: Spontaneous Grain Nucleation Inside the Grain Boundary Groovmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 3D model was proposed by Jhang et al [86] to determine the nucleation probability at the level of {111} facets. This model was specifically applied to several of our experimental cases.…”
Section: Twin Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements confirm that the undercooling measured in grain boundary grooves and at the edges are sufficient for twin nucleation on the {111} facets. A 3D model was proposed by Jhang et al [86] to determine the nucleation probability at the level of {111} facets. This model was specifically applied to several of our experimental cases.…”
Section: Twin Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%