2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous reduction of U6+ by structural Fe2+ from theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
84
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
4
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is also evidence that direct reduction to U(IV) occurs and is accompanied by the release of Fe(II) into solution (31). The discrepancy in reduction mechanisms observed among studies is likely due to the fact that control on the extent of U(VI) reduction is wrought by the combination of two competing factors: the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ ratio at the surface of iron minerals and the U coordination environment (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is also evidence that direct reduction to U(IV) occurs and is accompanied by the release of Fe(II) into solution (31). The discrepancy in reduction mechanisms observed among studies is likely due to the fact that control on the extent of U(VI) reduction is wrought by the combination of two competing factors: the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ ratio at the surface of iron minerals and the U coordination environment (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the data suggest that, in contrast to the biotic system, the fractionation generated by reduction processes persists in the product due to limited isotopic exchange between U(IV) and U(VI). Uranium in all three valences states [U(VI), U(V), and U(IV)] was reported to be sequestered at the surface or within the bulk of the Fe-bearing mineral (32,33), precluding such exchange. This sequestration is also true for aqueous Fe(II)-mediated A B Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 More generally, the availability of Fe(II) at the mineral-water interface, either as the result of adsorption or in surface sites, can impact the extent of U(VI) reduction, ranging from complete to partial reduction. 13,[16][17][18][19][20][21] Studies to date have provided U(VI) reduction rates for a wide range of solution conditions and mineral characteristics. However, a molecular-scale view of the process is lacking.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the Fe-based sequestration of U in the Fe-rich veins could also be related to the formation of magnetite, 10Å mica, and chlorite that are known for the surface catalyzed U-reduction (Moyes et al, 2000;Dodge et al, 2002;Ilton et al, 2004;Scott et al 2005;Skomurski et al, 2011). Chlorite has been observed to reduce U(VI) in the CO 3 -rich systems (Singer et al, 2009), analogous to the observed formation of calcite-rich veins.…”
Section: Fe-rich Veins -Natural Analogue For Gel Formation During Thementioning
confidence: 81%
“…( Moyes et al, 2000;Dodge et al, 2002;Ilton et al, 2004;Scott et al, 2005;Féron et al, 2008;Ferriss et al, 2009;Singer et al, 2009;Skomurski et al, 2011;Burger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fe-rich Veins -Natural Analogue For Gel Formation During Theunclassified