2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous preferences for agricultural landscape improvements in southern Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also against our expectations based on earlier findings regarding the significance of the presence of man-made elements in the landscape [46,47].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was also against our expectations based on earlier findings regarding the significance of the presence of man-made elements in the landscape [46,47].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Rural buildings [44], particularly farm buildings [45,46] and cultural buildings [47,48], are positively related to landscape evaluations, especially when these buildings are old [41], traditional [16,37,49] or well preserved [42]. Moreover, respondents approve of the presence of visual dividers, i.e., buffer zones that contain grassy or tree-covered areas, hedgerows or terraces [15,45,50,51], and the presence of grazing animals [37,46,49].…”
Section: Selection Of Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boxall and Adamowicz considered latent classes in destination choices for wilderness recreation and, to incorporate social and psychological influence with choice attribute data, applied factor analysis to a set of motivational statements. Further applications to recreation and landscape include Provencher and Bishop (2004), Scarpa and Thiene (2005), Grammatikopoulou et al (2012), and Juutinen et al (2017). A different model for unobserved taste heterogeneity, the random parameters logit (RPL) (Train 1998Hensher and Greene 2003), deals with preference heterogeneity at the individual level across all attributes (Hynes, Hanley, and Scarpa 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grammatikopoulou et al (2012) and Hasund et al (2011) assess landscape attributes in agricultural lands in Finland and Sweden, respectively. The studies show a significant willingness to pay for landscapes that support grazing animals and that ensure relatively larger "viewscapes" rather than small isolated grasslands.…”
Section: Literature Summary: Economic Values From Landscape Scenery mentioning
confidence: 99%