2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous political connections and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most of the early studies on crash risk, scholars tend to explain crash risk from the perspective of investors' various views on how information asymmetry can affect stock prices (e.g., Campbell & Hentschel, 1992;Chen et al, 2001;Hong & Stein, 2003). However, in more recent studies, scholars have gradually extended the explanation of information asymmetry to a wider scope based on agency theoretical framework in exploiting various factors on crash risk such as: earning management (Hutton et al, 2009); aggressive tax avoidance (Kim et al, 2011a); corporate social responsibility (Kim et al, 2014); corporate governance (Tarkovska, 2017); religion (Callen & Fang, 2015); corporate philanthropy (Zhang et al, 2016); takeover protection (Bhargava et al, 2017); business strategy (Habib & Hasan, 2017), and political connection (Luo et al, 2016;Tee, 2019;Tee et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the early studies on crash risk, scholars tend to explain crash risk from the perspective of investors' various views on how information asymmetry can affect stock prices (e.g., Campbell & Hentschel, 1992;Chen et al, 2001;Hong & Stein, 2003). However, in more recent studies, scholars have gradually extended the explanation of information asymmetry to a wider scope based on agency theoretical framework in exploiting various factors on crash risk such as: earning management (Hutton et al, 2009); aggressive tax avoidance (Kim et al, 2011a); corporate social responsibility (Kim et al, 2014); corporate governance (Tarkovska, 2017); religion (Callen & Fang, 2015); corporate philanthropy (Zhang et al, 2016); takeover protection (Bhargava et al, 2017); business strategy (Habib & Hasan, 2017), and political connection (Luo et al, 2016;Tee, 2019;Tee et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our additional results contribute to active monitoring theory by concluding that higher dedicated institutional investors' ownership reduces the risk of stock price crashes. Fourth, we extend a recent study of Tee et al (2021), who examine the likelihood of stock crashes for different types of politically connected firms in Malaysia, by emphasizing the crucial role of both internal and external governance tools, i.e. RC and institutional investors in predicting and mitigating the risk of stock price crash in financial sector.…”
Section: Jaee 133mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This paper makes several contributions to the literature. First, while prior studies that examined the determinants of stock price crash risk have centered on institutional investors stability (Callen and Fang, 2013; Tee et al , 2021), real earnings management (Francis et al , 2016), accounting conservatism (Kim and Zhang, 2016), tax avoidance level (Kim et al , 2011b), short interest (Callen and Fang, 2015), stock liquidity (Chang et al , 2016), powerful CEO (Mamun et al , 2020), CEO age (Andreou et al , 2017), CEO overconfidence (Kim et al , 2016), inefficient governance (Andreou et al , 2016), related party transactions (Habib et al , 2021; Shen et al , 2014), political incentives (Piotroski et al , 2015), and managerial equity incentives (Kim et al , 2011a), the role of RC in deterring crash risks still remains an empirical question. To the best of our knowledge, this research is the first to explore the association between RCs and the stock price crash risk in the financial sector in Malaysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant studies show that political connections can distort investment behaviour (Liu et al 2019), reduce investment efficiency (Li and Jin 2021), and weaken performance (Deng 2011) of enterprises. In addition, politically connected firms also face greater risk of stock price collapse (Tee et al 2021). Therefore, politically connected firms are more likely to appear as financial problems.…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%