2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous object modeling with material convolution surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From each homogeneous region a set of points P = {p 1 Figure 3). In this process an appropriate element size needs to be fitted on the boundary and inside the implicit model [7], [16], [13] (see Section 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From each homogeneous region a set of points P = {p 1 Figure 3). In this process an appropriate element size needs to be fitted on the boundary and inside the implicit model [7], [16], [13] (see Section 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalar r i in the vector ( r 1 , r 2 , …, r k ) represents the volume fraction of the i th primary material, the sum value of all the scalars should be one such that the material composition X m is physically meaningful. [ 60 ]…”
Section: Design Concepts For Fgmammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last approach is a new FGM modeling approach that uses simple material primitives, that is, points, 1D curves (straight lines or splines), and planes to build sophisticated material distributions ( Figure a–d). Gupta et al [ 60 ] investigated a material convolution surface‐based approach using material primitives. Through the use of various 1D material distributions model by membership functions and material potential functions, 2D and 3D material distributions (Figure 4e,f) can be generated for irregular heterogeneous objects.…”
Section: Design Concepts For Fgmammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for fiberreinforced injection molding, there are many local discontinuities of the fiber orientation distribution, which cannot be properly modeled by the control feature-based method. The majority of these methods only support the modeling of simple geometries, 18 such as the form feature-based geometry models. This severely limits the application scope.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%