The World Wide Web Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3308558.3313562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network

Abstract: Graph neural network, as a powerful graph representation technique based on deep learning, has shown superior performance and attracted considerable research interest. However, it has not been fully considered in graph neural network for heterogeneous graph which contains different types of nodes and links. The heterogeneity and rich semantic information bring great challenges for designing a graph neural network for heterogeneous graph. Recently, one of the most exciting advancements in deep learning is the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
1,010
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,636 publications
(1,027 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
1,010
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This module simply conducts different linear projections for nodes of different types. Such a procedure can be regarded to map heterogeneous data into the same distribution, which is also adopted in literature [23,27]. Implementation Details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This module simply conducts different linear projections for nodes of different types. Such a procedure can be regarded to map heterogeneous data into the same distribution, which is also adopted in literature [23,27]. Implementation Details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the classical paradigms is to define and use meta paths to model heterogeneous structures, such as PathSim [18] and metapath2vec [3]. Recently, in view of graph neural networks' (GNNs) success [7,9,22], there are several attempts to adopt GNNs to learn with heterogeneous networks [14,23,26,27]. However, these works face several issues: First, most of them involve the design of meta paths for each type of heterogeneous graphs, requiring specific domain knowledge; Second, they either simply assume that different types of nodes/edges share the same feature and representation space or keep distinct non-sharing weights for either node type or edge type alone, making them insufficient to capture heterogeneous graphs' properties; Third, most of them ignore the dynamic nature of every (heterogeneous) graph; Finally, their intrinsic design and implementation make them incapable of modeling Web-scale heterogeneous graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The model discards all intermediate nodes along the metapath by only considering two end nodes, which results in information loss (e.g., HERec [23] and HAN [31]). (3) The model relies on a single metapath to embed the heterogeneous graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. Hu and other side information [10], [11]. This new learning paradigm has shifted the tasks of seeking complex models for classification, clustering, and link prediction [12] to learning a compact and informative representation for the graph data, so that many graph mining tasks can be easily performed by employing simple traditional models (e.g., a linear SVM for the classification task).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%