2016
DOI: 10.1002/for.2433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Forecast Adjustment

Abstract: There is ample empirical evidence that expert‐adjusted model forecasts can be improved. One way to potential improvement concerns providing various forms of feedback to the sales forecasters. It is also often recognized that the experts (forecasters) might not constitute a homogeneous group. This paper provides a data‐based methodology to discern latent clusters of forecasters, and applies it to a fully new large database with data on expert‐adjusted forecasts, model forecasts and realizations. For the data at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By means of this objective data set, the forecaster becomes empowered to challenge and improve his forecast (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). Adjusting or correcting forecasts is an already established tool in the financial and forecasting literature in terms of judgementally adjusting model‐based forecasts by experts (Wolfe & Flores, 1990; Sanders & Ritzman, 2001; De Bruijn & Franses, 2017), combining statistical forecasts with analysts' predictions (Lobo, 1991; Bunn & Wright, 1991) and combining analysts' forecasts or using consensus forecasts (Butler & Saraoglu, 1999; Ramnath et al, 2005; Jame et al, 2016). However, Du and McEnroe (2011) examine reports by research firms with multiple analysts' forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By means of this objective data set, the forecaster becomes empowered to challenge and improve his forecast (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). Adjusting or correcting forecasts is an already established tool in the financial and forecasting literature in terms of judgementally adjusting model‐based forecasts by experts (Wolfe & Flores, 1990; Sanders & Ritzman, 2001; De Bruijn & Franses, 2017), combining statistical forecasts with analysts' predictions (Lobo, 1991; Bunn & Wright, 1991) and combining analysts' forecasts or using consensus forecasts (Butler & Saraoglu, 1999; Ramnath et al, 2005; Jame et al, 2016). However, Du and McEnroe (2011) examine reports by research firms with multiple analysts' forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of this objective data subset of similar firms the forecaster is equipped to challenge and improve their forecast (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979). Such adjustements of model based forecasts by experts (Wolfe and Flores, 1990;Sanders and Ritzman, 2001;De Bruijn and Franses, 2017) or combinations of statistical forecasts with analysts' predictions (Lobo, 1991;Bunn and Wright, 1991) are already established in the financial and forecasting literature. Additionally, the resulting reference classes can be used to issue a distributional forecast and interval or point forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%